Hi Bogdan,
sorry for taking a while ...
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 11:18 +1000, Bogdan Opanchuk wrote:
> For some reason this message has not shown up in the list archives, so
> I'll resend it again.
>
> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 12:21 PM, holger krekel wrote:
>
> > do you want to consider performan
Hi Holger,
For some reason this message has not shown up in the list archives, so
I'll resend it again.
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 12:21 PM, holger krekel wrote:
> do you want to consider performance regressions as a failure?
Not really. I just need some table with performance results that I
could
Hi Holger,
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 12:21 PM, holger krekel wrote:
> do you want to consider performance regressions as a failure?
Not really. I just need some table with performance results that I
could get for different systems/versions and compare them. Besides,
performance regressions can be
Hi Bogdan,
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 02:16 +1100, Bogdan Opanchuk wrote:
> I am trying to wrap performance tests for my module into py.test. Each
> testcase is, basically, a data preparation stage (can take some time)
> and the test itself. Is there some way (hooks, plugins) to make
> py.test print
Hello,
I am trying to wrap performance tests for my module into py.test. Each
testcase is, basically, a data preparation stage (can take some time)
and the test itself. Is there some way (hooks, plugins) to make
py.test print the value returned from the testcase (and make testcases
time whatever t
