Hi all,
I'm not a website contributor; I have no idea how to make the website work :-)
I needed to modify the PyPI css which resides in www.python.org/css.
I've edited the file on dinsdale, but can someone tell me whether
there needs to be a change in the website SVN to make the change
stick?
"Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> Am 07.04.2011 10:55, schrieb M.-A. Lemburg:
>> "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
Unless I'm reading the meaning of those log lines incorrectly that
means the apache timeout is insufficient to protect against dangling
client connections.
>>>
>>> I have reduced the ti
On 31/03/2011 14:26, Michael Foord wrote:
Were these supposed to be redirects by now?
Still 404s.
Michael
Michael
Original Message
Subject:Broken links at http://svn.python.org
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:09:58 +0400
From: Alexey Ivanov
To: webmas...@python
Am 07.04.2011 10:55, schrieb M.-A. Lemburg:
> "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>>> Unless I'm reading the meaning of those log lines incorrectly that
>>> means the apache timeout is insufficient to protect against dangling
>>> client connections.
>>
>> I have reduced the timeout to 30s now. If somebody thi
Thanks Aahz. The new pending sponsor section on the web page looks great!
Pat
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Aahz wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011, Pat Campbell wrote:
> >
> > Hi Pydotorg:
> >
> > Could you please add Online Degree Reviews to the Sponsor web page:
> >
> > http://www.python.org/ps
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>>> Unless I'm reading the meaning of those log lines incorrectly that
>>> means the apache timeout is insufficient to protect against dangling
>>> client connections.
>>
>> I have reduced the timeout to 30s now. If somebody thinks this is a bad
>> id
"Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>> Unless I'm reading the meaning of those log lines incorrectly that
>> means the apache timeout is insufficient to protect against dangling
>> client connections.
>
> I have reduced the timeout to 30s now. If somebody thinks this is a bad
> idea, please let me know.
If
> Unless I'm reading the meaning of those log lines incorrectly that
> means the apache timeout is insufficient to protect against dangling
> client connections.
I have reduced the timeout to 30s now. If somebody thinks this is a bad
idea, please let me know.
> I've received the following advice
