Re: [pydotorg-www] [PSF-Board] License of website

2012-04-20 Thread Steve Holden
I hadn't considered the Wiki. Yet another reason to hate them, I guess. Moin, by the way, appears to (again ...) be running like a dog. Is there anything we can do about this? regards Steve On Apr 20, 2012, at 10:28 AM, Michael Foord wrote: So for the wiki at least, and potentially for the

Re: [pydotorg-www] [PSF-Board] License of website

2012-04-20 Thread Michael Foord
On 20 Apr 2012, at 15:45, Steve Holden wrote: I hadn't considered the Wiki. Yet another reason to hate them, I guess. This non-profit would accept PARTIAL PERMISSION as an answer. Ok for me to grant them permission to mirror for offline use, except for the wiki? I dislike excessive lawyering

Re: [pydotorg-www] [PSF-Board] License of website

2012-04-20 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Am 20.04.2012 16:45, schrieb Steve Holden: I hadn't considered the Wiki. Yet another reason to hate them, I guess. Moin, by the way, appears to (again ...) be running like a dog. Is there anything we can do about this? [this exclusive we again] Diagnose this further, and then fix the

Re: [pydotorg-www] [PSF-Board] License of website

2012-04-20 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Am 20.04.2012 16:53, schrieb Michael Foord: On 20 Apr 2012, at 15:45, Steve Holden wrote: I hadn't considered the Wiki. Yet another reason to hate them, I guess. This non-profit would accept PARTIAL PERMISSION as an answer. Ok for me to grant them permission to mirror for offline use,

Re: [pydotorg-www] [PSF-Board] License of website

2012-04-20 Thread Radomir Dopieralski
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 16:56, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote: Am 20.04.2012 16:45, schrieb Steve Holden: I hadn't considered the Wiki. Yet another reason to hate them, I guess. Moin, by the way, appears to (again ...) be running like a dog. Is there anything we can do about this?

Re: [pydotorg-www] [PSF-Board] License of website

2012-04-20 Thread Steve Holden
I think that would be about the worst possible approach. WEll, no, I could think of worse, but we can't tell people to ignore potential copyright issues on content we publish in our wiki. We simply don't have that right. S On Apr 20, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Carl Karsten wrote: Could someone say

Re: [pydotorg-www] [PSF-Board] License of website

2012-04-20 Thread Guido van Rossum
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:37 PM, A.M. Kuchling a...@amk.ca wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 08:57:45PM +0200, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: Steve Holden wrote: At the moment the only thing we can tell people requesting the PSF's opinion on the wiki content is that we don't own the copyright and thus

Re: [pydotorg-www] [PSF-Board] License of website

2012-04-20 Thread M.-A. Lemburg
A.M. Kuchling wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 08:57:45PM +0200, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: Steve Holden wrote: At the moment the only thing we can tell people requesting the PSF's opinion on the wiki content is that we don't own the copyright and thus cannot make a statement. Should we add a

Re: [pydotorg-www] [PSF-Board] License of website

2012-04-20 Thread Jeremy Baron
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 16:55, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote: A.M. Kuchling wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 08:57:45PM +0200, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: Steve Holden wrote: At the moment the only thing we can tell people requesting the PSF's opinion on the wiki content is that we don't own the

Re: [pydotorg-www] [PSF-Board] License of website

2012-04-20 Thread M.-A. Lemburg
Jeremy Baron wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 16:55, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote: A.M. Kuchling wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 08:57:45PM +0200, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: Steve Holden wrote: At the moment the only thing we can tell people requesting the PSF's opinion on the wiki content is