On 06/26/2017 04:51 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> On 27.06.2017 00:41, Fox wrote:
>>
I noticed how few edits were made in the last 90 day alone.
How restrictive is your policy and does that negatively impact the
quality (say the lamentable high number of dead links) of the wiki ?
I noticed how few edits were made in the last 90 day alone.
How restrictive is your policy and does that negatively impact the
quality (say the lamentable high number of dead links) of the wiki ?
If so, what do plan to mitigate this dire situation ?
We have no plans changing the policy. Of
AS a no-more-then-tangential reply I will point out in the defence of
anyone who might be held responsible for not "plan[ning] to mitigate this
dire situation," that the site content is maintained entirely by
volunteers. It's possible that our current approach won't scale, but it's
equally likely
On 11.06.2017 13:43, Chris Angelico wrote:
Our anti-robot protection is no secret. Before anyone can edit, he or
she has to get explicit permission from an admin. :)
to most bona fide users this is actually very much a :-(
All you have to
do is set pages to be read-only by default, and
