Re: [pygtk] pygobject matching glib version numbers

2010-09-25 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 00:48, John Stowers wrote: > On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 10:07 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> Hi, >> >> John Stowers has proposed that PyGObject changes it's version >> numbering to match that of glib. This means that the next stable >> version will be 2.26 instead of 2.22. >> >>

[pygtk] [ANNOUNCE] PyGTK 2.22.0

2010-09-25 Thread John Stowers
Hi All, A new stable development release of the Python bindings for GTK-2 has been released. The new release is available from ftp.gnome.org and its mirrors as soon as its synced correctly: http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/pygtk/2.22/ Note: PyGtk 2.22 supports the GTK-2.22 API. New users

Re: [pygtk] pygobject matching glib version numbers

2010-09-25 Thread John Stowers
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 10:07 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > Hi, > > John Stowers has proposed that PyGObject changes it's version > numbering to match that of glib. This means that the next stable > version will be 2.26 instead of 2.22. > > The rationale is that it will help people a bit to know wha

[pygtk] UIManager Lacks Required Feature. Alternatives?

2010-09-25 Thread Bradlee Landis
My program is currently making use of UIManager. We've recently started splitting up the menu definitions to the class in which the widget using it is defined, but I'm finding that there's really no way to keep the order that I want. I can't imagine "position='top'" being very helpful at all. IMO,

Re: [pygtk] Windows installer components

2010-09-25 Thread Rafael Villar Burke (Pachi)
Hi Mark, On 25/09/2010 2:06, Mark Schafer wrote: I suppose a full all-in-one would be: - python 2.6.5 - the all-in-one bundle from http://www.gtk.org/download-windows.html - PyGObject - PyCairo However - as most users will already have a version of Python - I think just needing three installe

Re: [pygtk] Windows installer components

2010-09-25 Thread Timo
On 25-09-10 02:06, Mark Schafer wrote: Maybe someone with more knowledge than me can indicate if we need any of the optional packages that are not in the GTK "all-in-one" package. E.g. pixman looks like it might be required ?? If there are several - then we may need to make our own all-in-one