[pygtk] Re: Fwd: gtk+ API change; who should fix it? (A.k.a. Why isn't GNOME 2.19.4 released yet?)

2008-07-09 Thread Tim Janik
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Tommi Komulainen wrote: On 6/22/07, Tim Janik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: c) note that the actual compilation changes could easily be ironed out by Gtk+ by doing s/_tips_data_list/tips_data_list/ but was introduced deliberately, to catch remaining tips_data_list uses

[pygtk] Re: Fwd: gtk+ API change; who should fix it? (A.k.a. Why isn't GNOME 2.19.4 released yet?)

2008-07-09 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 10:27 +0200, Tim Janik wrote: > so far, my take on the issue is that PyGtk should adapt to that > change by not using tooltips->tips_data_list I have attached a patch to http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449318 that removes access to private GtkTooltips struct m

[pygtk] Re: Fwd: gtk+ API change; who should fix it? (A.k.a. Why isn't GNOME 2.19.4 released yet?)

2008-07-09 Thread Matthias Clasen
On 6/22/07, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 10:27 +0200, Tim Janik wrote: > so far, my take on the issue is that PyGtk should adapt to that > change by not using tooltips->tips_data_list I have attached a patch to http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4493

[pygtk] Re: Fwd: gtk+ API change; who should fix it? (A.k.a. Why isn't GNOME 2.19.4 released yet?)

2008-07-09 Thread Tommi Komulainen
On 6/22/07, Tim Janik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: c) note that the actual compilation changes could easily be ironed out by Gtk+ by doing s/_tips_data_list/tips_data_list/ but was introduced deliberately, to catch remaining tips_data_list uses in third-party code which should be remove

[pygtk] Re: Fwd: gtk+ API change; who should fix it? (A.k.a. Why isn't GNOME 2.19.4 released yet?)

2008-07-09 Thread Tim Janik
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Murray Cumming wrote: On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 11:03 +0200, Tim Janik wrote: On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Murray Cumming wrote: On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 10:46 +0200, Tim Janik wrote: On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Murray Cumming wrote: On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 10:27 +0200, Tim Janik wrote: b)

[pygtk] Re: Fwd: gtk+ API change; who should fix it? (A.k.a. Why isn't GNOME 2.19.4 released yet?)

2008-07-09 Thread Tim Janik
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Murray Cumming wrote: On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 10:46 +0200, Tim Janik wrote: On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Murray Cumming wrote: On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 10:27 +0200, Tim Janik wrote: b) GtkTooltips is going to be deprecated in 2.12 anyways, so there is little use in continuing t

[pygtk] Re: Fwd: gtk+ API change; who should fix it? (A.k.a. Why isn't GNOME 2.19.4 released yet?)

2008-07-09 Thread Tim Janik
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Elijah Newren wrote: Just realized that pygtk and gtk-devel-list subscribers may not be on d-d-l. So I'm forwarding this. See http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2007-June/msg00109.html for the thread and discussion. Please jump in. -- Forwarded mes

[pygtk] Re: Fwd: gtk+ API change; who should fix it? (A.k.a. Why isn't GNOME 2.19.4 released yet?)

2008-07-09 Thread Tim Janik
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Murray Cumming wrote: On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 10:27 +0200, Tim Janik wrote: b) GtkTooltips is going to be deprecated in 2.12 anyways, so there is little use in continuing to use it anyway. c) note that the actual compilation changes could easily be ironed out by Gtk

[pygtk] Re: Fwd: gtk+ API change; who should fix it? (A.k.a. Why isn't GNOME 2.19.4 released yet?)

2007-06-25 Thread Elijah Newren
On 6/22/07, Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/22/07, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 10:27 +0200, Tim Janik wrote: > > > so far, my take on the issue is that PyGtk should adapt to that > > change by not using tooltips->tips_data_list > > I hav

[pygtk] Re: Fwd: gtk+ API change; who should fix it? (A.k.a. Why isn't GNOME 2.19.4 released yet?)

2007-06-22 Thread Murray Cumming
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 11:20 +0200, Tim Janik wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Murray Cumming wrote: > > > On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 11:03 +0200, Tim Janik wrote: > >> On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Murray Cumming wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 10:46 +0200, Tim Janik wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Murr

[pygtk] Re: Fwd: gtk+ API change; who should fix it? (A.k.a. Why isn't GNOME 2.19.4 released yet?)

2007-06-22 Thread Murray Cumming
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 11:03 +0200, Tim Janik wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Murray Cumming wrote: > > > On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 10:46 +0200, Tim Janik wrote: > >> On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Murray Cumming wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 10:27 +0200, Tim Janik wrote: > >> > b) GtkTooltips is go

[pygtk] Re: Fwd: gtk+ API change; who should fix it? (A.k.a. Why isn't GNOME 2.19.4 released yet?)

2007-06-22 Thread Murray Cumming
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 10:46 +0200, Tim Janik wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Murray Cumming wrote: > > > On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 10:27 +0200, Tim Janik wrote: > > >> b) GtkTooltips is going to be deprecated in 2.12 anyways, so there > >> is little use in continuing to use it anyway. > >> c) note

[pygtk] Re: Fwd: gtk+ API change; who should fix it? (A.k.a. Why isn't GNOME 2.19.4 released yet?)

2007-06-22 Thread Murray Cumming
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 10:27 +0200, Tim Janik wrote: > > As noted in bug http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449318, > > there was a recent gtk+ API change. jdahlin just barely told me that > > the changed API has existed since 1998, long before gtk+-2.11.x (and > > pointed me to http://bugzi