Re: [pygtk] Turning the PyGTK+ brand into something more than it currently is

2012-11-19 Thread pier carteri
Hi to all, After a long time I'm back on python and gtk. I'm using gobject and I like it a lot... I totally agree with Rafael; we must start contributing to the Python GTK+3 in order to have a guide as complete as the one for pygtk. The second step can be to help Dieter as beta tester with his

Re: [pygtk] Turning the PyGTK+ brand into something more than it currently is

2012-11-18 Thread Giuseppe Penone
Hi Simon, On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Giuseppe Penone gius...@gmail.com wrote: I read that there's no need of reference because gtk3 reference is enough, well I'm a gtk3 and gtkmm3 developer over a pygtk developer (my most used app is www.giuspen.com/cherrytree) but still I miss pygtk

Re: [pygtk] Turning the PyGTK+ brand into something more than it currently is

2012-11-18 Thread Pachi
El 17/11/2012 23:28, John Stowers escribió: I think we could do a lot more with the PyGTK+ name and http://www.pygtk.org/ to promote gobject-introspection as our new, exciting solution. If nothing else, it rolls off the tongue much easier. Say it a few times. Anybody have any other ideas here?

[pygtk] Turning the PyGTK+ brand into something more than it currently is

2012-11-17 Thread Jasper St. Pierre
I like Python. I help new people out in Python IRC channels, on forums, and I recommend Python to friends and family who say they want to learn programming. At some point, the time comes when they want to start doing fancy graphical GUI stuff. And after a little bit of research, they come to a

Re: [pygtk] Turning the PyGTK+ brand into something more than it currently is

2012-11-17 Thread Giuseppe Penone
I totally agree with Jasper. New PyGobject is lame because misses its own reference and doesn't work on windows (well this is mainly a GTK3 issue...) I read that there's no need of reference because gtk3 reference is enough, well I'm a gtk3 and gtkmm3 developer over a pygtk developer (my most

Re: [pygtk] Turning the PyGTK+ brand into something more than it currently is

2012-11-17 Thread Mark Summerfield
Hi Jasper, On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 16:25:32 -0500 Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net wrote: I like Python. I help new people out in Python IRC channels, on forums, and I recommend Python to friends and family who say they want to learn programming. At some point, the time comes when they

Re: [pygtk] Turning the PyGTK+ brand into something more than it currently is

2012-11-17 Thread John Stowers
I think we could do a lot more with the PyGTK+ name and http://www.pygtk.org/ to promote gobject-introspection as our new, exciting solution. If nothing else, it rolls off the tongue much easier. Say it a few times. Anybody have any other ideas here? I think the stupidest mistake in

Re: [pygtk] Turning the PyGTK+ brand into something more than it currently is

2012-11-17 Thread Simon Feltman
Hi Giuseppe, On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Giuseppe Penone gius...@gmail.com wrote: I read that there's no need of reference because gtk3 reference is enough, well I'm a gtk3 and gtkmm3 developer over a pygtk developer (my most used app is www.giuspen.com/cherrytree) but still I miss pygtk