On Sat, 2013-11-02 at 13:43 -0700, Sarvi Shanmugham wrote:
> 1. I didn't ask if I could use his code. Which I will ask explicitly again. I
> had just encouraged him a few months ago to set aside his differences work
> together for which he was not interested. Which I do not interpret as no to
>
1. I didn't ask if I could use his code. Which I will ask explicitly again. I
had just encouraged him a few months ago to set aside his differences work
together for which he was not interested. Which I do not interpret as no to
merging. But will check again.
2. I will get closure working before
Two things:
1. When you ask someone whether you may use his code and he says 'No',
then you shouldn't (regardless of the license, that's my opinion).
2. If you manage to get closure working, I don't care about dotted
notation or not. If you don't get closure working, I rather not go back
to dotted
I went through dry run of the merge. Its been a while and there were a lot
of changes.
Big ticket Items
1. Kees's change from doted notation to dictionary notation is causing
a lot of conflicts in one file.
2. The pyjs_site directory is gone from pyjs.org repo and is still
exists in pyj.
