On Saturday 1 August 2009 06:13:47 Kelvin Lawson wrote:
> Interesting question. From the start I always intended for PyKaraoke to be
> usable in commercial projects. To that end I deliberately avoided GPL to
> remove any restrictions / concerns that commercial projects may have about
> whether they
Hi John,
2009/7/31 John Schneiderman
> There's some debate here where I work about moving forward with the
> PyKaraoke
> project. At this time nothing has been decided or set in stone. We want to
> open up communications to see if our goals fit the community. We are
> looking
> for a karaoke pla
On Friday 31 July 2009 16:20:02 Tim wrote:
> I am not familiar with who all holds the copyrights to code in the
> project, but if your worry is that someone will take this product and
> compete with your company with the same code, then why don't you just
> use a full GPL rather than the LGPL? It
> There's some debate here where I work about moving forward with the PyKaraoke
> project. At this time nothing has been decided or set in stone. We want to
> open up communications to see if our goals fit the community. We are looking
> for a karaoke player that we can use in a professional cap
There's some debate here where I work about moving forward with the PyKaraoke
project. At this time nothing has been decided or set in stone. We want to
open up communications to see if our goals fit the community. We are looking
for a karaoke player that we can use in a professional capacity. T
