Re: [Pykaraoke-discuss] Extended Debate

2009-08-03 Thread John Schneiderman
On Saturday 1 August 2009 06:13:47 Kelvin Lawson wrote: Interesting question. From the start I always intended for PyKaraoke to be usable in commercial projects. To that end I deliberately avoided GPL to remove any restrictions / concerns that commercial projects may have about whether they

Re: [Pykaraoke-discuss] Extended Debate

2009-08-01 Thread Kelvin Lawson
Hi John, 2009/7/31 John Schneiderman joh...@meent.biz There's some debate here where I work about moving forward with the PyKaraoke project. At this time nothing has been decided or set in stone. We want to open up communications to see if our goals fit the community. We are looking for a

Re: [Pykaraoke-discuss] Extended Debate

2009-07-31 Thread Tim
There's some debate here where I work about moving forward with the PyKaraoke project. At this time nothing has been decided or set in stone. We want to open up communications to see if our goals fit the community. We are looking for a karaoke player that we can use in a professional

Re: [Pykaraoke-discuss] Extended Debate

2009-07-31 Thread John Schneiderman
On Friday 31 July 2009 16:20:02 Tim wrote: I am not familiar with who all holds the copyrights to code in the project, but if your worry is that someone will take this product and compete with your company with the same code, then why don't you just use a full GPL rather than the LGPL? It may