Update: I found a way to check for the exact exception reported, which
was common to the Sprox failure and other unsliceable failures
("TypeError: unhashable type"). So I can at least raise the
incompatible message so users will know what's going on.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Mike Orr wro
I changed the .__slice__ to .__getitem__. This passes the tests in the
SQLAlchemy and sliceable cases. I think it will let some non-sliceable
cases through which would cause the original Sprox error, but i don't
think there's anything we can do about that because we can't check
whether .__getitem__
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Ben Bangert wrote:
> On Mar 22, 2011, at 6:30 PM, Michael Merickel wrote:
>
>> I'd imagine we can update Paste to support an alias for templates?
>>
>> paster create --list-scaffolding
>> paster create --scaffold pyramid_starter
>> paster create -s pyramid_routesal
On Mar 22, 2011, at 6:30 PM, Michael Merickel wrote:
> I'd imagine we can update Paste to support an alias for templates?
>
> paster create --list-scaffolding
> paster create --scaffold pyramid_starter
> paster create -s pyramid_routesalchemy
>
> Maybe the actual "templates" commands could even
I'd imagine we can update Paste to support an alias for templates?
paster create --list-scaffolding
paster create --scaffold pyramid_starter
paster create -s pyramid_routesalchemy
Maybe the actual "templates" commands could even be hidden from the help and
simply supported if ran with a deprecati
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Eric Lemoine
wrote:
> $ paster create --list-templates
> Available templates:
> basic_package: A basic setuptools-enabled package
> paste_deploy: A web application deployed through paste.deploy
> pylons: Pylons application tem
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Joe Dallago wrote:
> This issue has been previously discussed, I just wanted to make sure
> that everyone agrees. At the moment the docs refer to "paster
> templates" and renderered templates(mako, chameleon, jinja) using the
> same name. I propose that we change
On 22/03/2011 02:58, Chris McDonough wrote:
I just wanted to make sure that there was some distinction
between the two entities in the docs, b/c I remember this being an
issue as a beginner. It became even more of a problem, when I went to
IRC to ask questions, and confusion arrose over which
Am 22.03.2011 03:58 schrieb Chris McDonough:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkinson's_Law_of_Triviality
I would not dismiss this as pure bikeshedding though. Developers finally
start to understand that choosing adequate, understandable names *is*
important when writing code. For a counterexam
