Re: Pyramid application templates

2010-11-11 Thread Alexandre Conrad
Hey Mike, I agree with you that having questions would be nice. And for people not liking the questions, maybe we could have them answered automatically by passing options such as --with-sqla --with-zodb --with-mako --with-urldispatch, ... Just an idea. We could also have just a bare bone

Re: Pyramid application templates

2010-11-11 Thread Mike Orr
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Alexandre Conrad alexandre.con...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Mike, I agree with you that having questions would be nice. And for people not liking the questions, maybe we could have them answered automatically by passing options such as --with-sqla --with-zodb

Re: Pyramid application templates

2010-11-11 Thread Wichert Akkerman
On 11/11/10 05:05 , Mike Orr wrote: I'd like to see one template equivalent to the Pylons 1 template, with questions for SQLAlchemy and the template engine. The templates are pretty straightforward even with the conditionals. Looking forward, we'll also need questions for auth and ZODB. (Yes,

Re: Pyramid application templates

2010-11-11 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On Nov 11, 9:46 am, Mike Orr sluggos...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Alexandre Conrad We could also have just a bare bone Pyramid app with no template engine an no sqla/zodb. Such a setup could be for a webservice app that only returns JSON data, no HTML. That sounds

Re: Pyramid application templates

2010-11-11 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On Nov 11, 8:11 am, Alexandre Conrad alexandre.con...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Mike, I agree with you that having questions would be nice. And for people not liking the questions, maybe we could have them answered automatically by passing options such as --with-sqla --with-zodb --with-mako

Re: Pyramid application templates

2010-11-11 Thread Mike Orr
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Michael Haubenwallner michael.haubenwall...@gmail.com wrote: On Nov 11, 8:11 am, Alexandre Conrad alexandre.con...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Mike, I agree with you that having questions would be nice. And for people not liking the questions, maybe we could have

Re: Pyramid application templates

2010-11-11 Thread Andrew Sawyers
On 11/11/10 8:41 AM, Mike Orr sluggos...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Michael Haubenwallner michael.haubenwall...@gmail.com wrote: On Nov 11, 8:11 am, Alexandre Conrad alexandre.con...@gmail.com wrote: We could also have just a bare bone Pyramid app with no template

Re: Pyramid application templates

2010-11-10 Thread Chris McDonough
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 20:05 -0800, Mike Orr wrote: I think we need to think strategically about Pyramid's application templates. Agreed. There are already eight of them, with overlapping functionality and inconsistent names. There will probably be more templates coming, both bundled with

Re: Pyramid application templates

2010-11-10 Thread Christoph Zwerschke
Am 11.11.2010 05:05 schrieb Mike Orr: I think we need to think strategically about Pyramid's application templates. There are already eight of them, with overlapping functionality and inconsistent names. There will probably be more templates coming, both bundled with Pyramid and separate. ChrisM