[pylons-devel] Re: PasteDeploy in the Pylons GitHub org?

2016-03-08 Thread Jonathan Vanasco
Assuming (1) Ian isn't going to maintain it anymore, (2) You have his blessing as the new maintainer [but want to push this off]... You may be speaking about this, but if not... Have you considered an approach like starting a new github organization for pastedeploy (or paste) ? That would make

Re: [pylons-devel] PasteDeploy in the Pylons GitHub org?

2016-03-08 Thread Bert JW Regeer
That’s why he is asking if he can create the new repo under the Pylons banner. WebOb is another Ian Bicking project that now lives under the Pylons banner. Bert > On Mar 8, 2016, at 14:13, Jonathan Vanasco wrote: > > Assuming (1) Ian isn't going to maintain it anymore, (2) You have his > bles

Re: [pylons-devel] PasteDeploy in the Pylons GitHub org?

2016-03-08 Thread Michael Merickel
As of a couple years ago I was under the impression pastedeploy was maintained by alex gronholm. Is this no longer the case? To add a repo to the Pylons Project you need more than commit access, but also access to PyPI as well as the ability to redirect the docs to something under the Pylons Proje

Re: [pylons-devel] PasteDeploy in the Pylons GitHub org?

2016-03-08 Thread Marc Abramowitz
Yeah, Alex G. doesn't want to do it anymore. >From >https://bitbucket.org/ianb/pastedeploy/pull-requests/7/allow-global_conf-to-override-defaults-see/diff#comment-5374381 > I've pretty much washed my hands of this project. You're going to have to ask someone else. Sorry. To be honest, I'm not

Re: [pylons-devel] PasteDeploy in the Pylons GitHub org?

2016-03-08 Thread Michael Merickel
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Marc Abramowitz wrote: > > To be honest, I'm not sure I want to be solely responsible for it myself > either. I was hoping that if it was under the Pylons project, that would > allow more people to chip in, as needed. > The Pylons Project repositories still need to

Re: [pylons-devel] PasteDeploy in the Pylons GitHub org?

2016-03-08 Thread Mike Orr
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Michael Merickel wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Marc Abramowitz wrote: >> >> To be honest, I'm not sure I want to be solely responsible for it myself >> either. I was hoping that if it was under the Pylons project, that would >> allow more people to chi