Re: Should ✔ be truthy?

2013-04-18 Thread M. Page-Lieberman
I thought it was silly at first, but then found it easier on the eyes and quicker to confirm what's enabled. Still, requesting a change to the core language/library through additional code (with the inevitable introduction of more bugs) in order to support some syntactic sugar that really doesn't

Re: Should ✔ be truthy?

2013-04-18 Thread M. Page-Lieberman
:) I'd imagine we all do, but that brings up an interesting point. This would obviously be most seen in .py files. One can just imagine projects w/ various libraries from different third parties with different coding standards with check marks in some modules or even in some functions in the same

Re: Should ✔ be truthy?

2013-04-18 Thread Laurent DAVERIO
:) I'd imagine we all do, but that brings up an interesting point. This would obviously be most seen in .py files. One can just imagine projects w/ various libraries from different third parties with different coding standards with check marks in some modules or even in some functions in the

Re: Should ✔ be truthy?

2013-04-17 Thread Tjelvar
Hi John, Your .ini file looks very cool :) It may be worth bearing in mind that the check mark can have different connotations in different cultures. When I grew up in Sweden it was used to highlight exam questions that I answered incorrectly. There is some more information about this on

Re: Should ✔ be truthy?

2013-04-17 Thread Petr Blahos
Recently I was setting up configuration for a new project and was trying to do the obvious thing in my .ini: pyramid.reload_templates = ✔ pyramid.debug_authorization = ✖ pyramid.debug_notfound = ✖ pyramid.debug_routematch = ✖ pyramid.debug_templates = ✔ To my surprise, the checkmark did