On 10/18/07, Yannick Gingras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings Pyloneers,
I'm am please to announce the release of Gazest 0.3.7, a Pylons
powered wiki.
[snip]
Both the idea and the demo looks cool!
I tried it using easy_install, but failed with python-openid version
conflicted:
Bruce Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Both the idea and the demo looks cool!
Thanks
I tried it using easy_install, but failed with python-openid version
conflicted: [sniped]
This is quite annoying and I'm note sure how to solve the problem.
Maybe someone in here have an idea. Your
you should see if the Apache configuration you are using
defines a value for the ThreadStackSize directive.
Thanks for the hint.
I am still to make my experiments, but here is initial summary for
this thread from my point of view.
It is highly suspected, that significant part of the RAM
On 10/17/07, Graham Dumpleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that in general the argument that lighttpd and nginx are better
because they are quicker in serving static files is totally
meaningless in the context of Python web applications, as the real
work is being done in the Python
On 10/17/07, Ian Bicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ben Bangert wrote:
On Oct 17, 2007, at 2:24 PM, Christoph Haas wrote:
Why am I still confused by the top columns after 15 years of UNIX usage.
Yes, the virtual usage is around 100 MB while the resident size is at
about 18 MB.
Of
Finally I found the source of the problem.
In case of a file upload the responsible controller is called
immediately, even before the file is completely uploaded. The
execution of the controller instructions is stalled until the file is
uploaded completely if
- request.POST['data_file'] is
On Oct 18, 11:24 am, zunzun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have completed work on a new Pylons curve and surface fitting web
site tutorial, the URL is;
http://wiki.pylonshq.com/display/pylonscommunity/Pylons+Curve+and+Sur...
James Phillips
Thanks for the tutorial, I found it
On 10/21/07, Stou Sandalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am running 0.9.6, after some tinkering I found out it was
ToscaWidgets that was causing the dependency, sorry.
Is there something out there a bit 'newer' or 'cleaner' than tw that
someone can recommend? At least something that doesn't
On 10/21/07, Max Ischenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Stou,
On 10/22/07, Stou Sandalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am running 0.9.6, after some tinkering I found out it was
ToscaWidgets that was causing the dependency, sorry.
Is there something out there a bit 'newer' or 'cleaner'
Hello Mike,
On 10/22/07, Mike Orr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, to toscawidget or not to toscawidget? I'm about to write some
forms soon. I was going to learn TW because I assumed it would be
better in the long term when I add more Javascript features, and
better to start with it now than
Mike Orr wrote:
On 10/21/07, Stou Sandalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am running 0.9.6, after some tinkering I found out it was
ToscaWidgets that was causing the dependency, sorry.
Is there something out there a bit 'newer' or 'cleaner' than tw that
someone can recommend? At least
On 10/22/07, Yannick Gingras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is
really pissing me off because I wanted to postpone the switch to
Alchemy 0.4 a bit but everyone and their dog is going to have Alchemy
0.4 on disk now that it's stable.
I've been diverting sqlalchemy list messages to a folder so
Max Ischenko wrote:
Hello Mike,
On 10/22/07, *Mike Orr* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, to toscawidget or not to toscawidget? I'm about to write some
forms soon. I was going to learn TW because I assumed it would be
better in the long term when I
On 10/22/07, Alberto Valverde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- hard to use (basically no docs)
Fair enough. This is something I would really have liked to solve long
ago but seems like some sort of mental blockade of mine. I've tried my
best to personally give support in TW's mailing list to
Mike Orr wrote:
On 10/22/07, Alberto Valverde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- hard to use (basically no docs)
Fair enough. This is something I would really have liked to solve long
ago but seems like some sort of mental blockade of mine. I've tried my
best to personally give support in TW's
Philip Cooper wrote:
Alberto Valverde at about 10/22/07 2:07 PM said:
Max Ischenko wrote:
Hello Mike,
On 10/22/07, *Mike Orr* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, to toscawidget or not to toscawidget? I'm about to write some
forms soon.
I'm obviously
On Oct 22, 10:28 pm, Bob Ippolito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/17/07, Graham Dumpleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that in general the argument that lighttpd and nginx are better
because they are quicker in serving static files is totally
meaningless in the context of Python web
On Oct 22, 10:12 pm, Marcin Kasperski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
2) Consider (and test) mod_wsgi daemon mode. Main advantage over
embedded mode is that it will allow to tune wsgi threads (count,
stack size...) separately from main apache threads.
Noting though that mod_wsgi daemon mode
On Oct 22, 12:52 pm, Alberto Valverde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Orr wrote:
On 10/21/07, Stou Sandalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am running 0.9.6, after some tinkering I found out it was
ToscaWidgets that was causing the dependency, sorry.
Is there something out there a bit 'newer'
On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 12:18 +0200, Marcin Kasperski wrote:
I am watching with interest efforts to port WSGI to nginx which show
up on some lists. Nevertheless, it seems it will take some time...
Actually I believe Manlio's implementation is usable right now for WSGI
2.0, with WSGI 1.0 support
On Oct 23, 10:53 am, Cliff Wells [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 12:18 +0200, Marcin Kasperski wrote:
I am watching with interest efforts to port WSGI to nginx which show
up on some lists. Nevertheless, it seems it will take some time...
Actually I believe Manlio's
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 23:24 +, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
The complexity I am referring to is not in configuring nginx, but that
you also have to install and configure some separate supervisor system
which starts up and ensures that your backend process is running.
I think this argument
Hello Alberto,
On 10/22/07, Alberto Valverde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- too complicated an implementation.
Ironically enough one of the reasons I spun TW out of TG's widgets was
to simplify the implementation. I suspect the use of RuleDispatch
greatly contributes to this perception, this
On 10/23/07, Mike Orr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glad to hear this. :) So maybe I should reduce the initial scope of the
docs I have in mind and not dive directly into custom widgets but
concentrate on how existing widgets are used?
Yes. Think in terms of somebody who has used another
On Oct 23, 11:54 am, Cliff Wells [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 23:24 +, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
The complexity I am referring to is not in configuring nginx, but that
you also have to install and configure some separate supervisor system
which starts up and ensures
25 matches
Mail list logo
