+1 on releasing the artifacts.
On Mar 5, 2010, at 11:57 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> On Mar 4, 2010, at 5:32 PM, Andi Vajda wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Andi Vajda wrote:
>>
>>> With the recent - simultaneous - releases of Java Lucene 2.9.2 and 3.0.1,
>>> PyLucene 2.9.2-1 and 3.0.1-1
On Mar 4, 2010, at 5:32 PM, Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Andi Vajda wrote:
>
>> With the recent - simultaneous - releases of Java Lucene 2.9.2 and 3.0.1,
>> PyLucene 2.9.2-1 and 3.0.1-1 releases closely tracking them are ready.
>>
>> Release candidates are available from:
>>
>>
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Andi Vajda wrote:
With the recent - simultaneous - releases of Java Lucene 2.9.2 and 3.0.1,
PyLucene 2.9.2-1 and 3.0.1-1 releases closely tracking them are ready.
Release candidates are available from:
http://people.apache.org/~vajda/staging_area/
A list of changes in
+1 to release.
I used both releases to index first 100K docs from a Wikipedia export,
then ran several searches. All looks good.
Also, both releases produce identical search results.
Mike
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> With the recent - simultaneous - releases of Java L
+1 in favor...
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> With the recent - simultaneous - releases of Java Lucene 2.9.2 and 3.0.1,
> PyLucene 2.9.2-1 and 3.0.1-1 releases closely tracking them are ready.
>
> Release candidates are available from:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~vajda
With the recent - simultaneous - releases of Java Lucene 2.9.2 and 3.0.1,
PyLucene 2.9.2-1 and 3.0.1-1 releases closely tracking them are ready.
Release candidates are available from:
http://people.apache.org/~vajda/staging_area/
A list of changes in this release can be seen at:
http://svn
