On Mon, 8 Apr 2013, Thomas Koch wrote:
Hi Andi,
I could reproduce this and fixed it. A patch is available here:
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/4384120/pylucene42-facetexample-patch-20130408.txt
This is caused by change LUCENE-4700 in 4.2.1
cf. http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_2_1/changes/Changes.html
Hi Andi,
I could reproduce this and fixed it. A patch is available here:
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/4384120/pylucene42-facetexample-patch-20130408.txt
This is caused by change LUCENE-4700 in 4.2.1
cf. http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_2_1/changes/Changes.html
regards
Thomas
--
Am 07.04.2013 um 00:22
Hi Thomas,
I resumed with the PyLucene samples migration and FacetExample.py is broken
again because of another change in the facet module (I guess).
Namely, if you built PyLucene (trunk) against Lucene 4.2.1 by setting
LUCENE_SVN=http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/tags/lucene_solr_
> So, if each thread gets the same seed, then they should also get the same
> random values, right ?
They would start from the same seed so if they're calling that Random
in the same pattern then yes -- they'd get the same values. Any real
randomness will be non-reproducible. If this is needed fo
Hi folks,
> about the randomness: I think this should not be the case. if
> different threads try to share the same random, actually there should
> be an exception from the test framework saying that each thread should
> get its own random (eg. initialized by a long value). So lucene-java
> tests
> This one:
> lucene/core/src/test/org/apache/lucene/search/TestSort.java
Yeah, I figured by comparing the size of these three... So, to make it
short -- every thread should get its own Random instance from a call
to LuceneTestCase's
public static Random random() {
return RandomizedContex
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Dawid Weiss wrote:
about the randomness: I think this should not be the case. if
different threads try to share the same random, actually there should
be an exception from the test framework saying that each thread should
get its own random (eg. initialized by a long value)
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2013, Robert Muir wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Andi Vajda wrote:
>>>
>>> I then found that the test case from hell, TestSort.java, has majorly
>>> changed again and test_Sort.py needs to be ported again. Sigh.
>
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013, Robert Muir wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Andi Vajda wrote:
I then found that the test case from hell, TestSort.java, has majorly
changed again and test_Sort.py needs to be ported again. Sigh.
Andi..
I'm not laughing at your expense Andi... but this made me l
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Andi Vajda wrote:
> I then found that the test case from hell, TestSort.java, has majorly
> changed again and test_Sort.py needs to be ported again. Sigh.
>
> Andi..
I'm not laughing at your expense Andi... but this made me laugh out
loud multiple times today.
I'
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013, Thomas Koch wrote:
Hi Andi, You're right - and API docs are wrong. Actually both must have
change after 4.1 release: I checked the source of java-lucene v4.1
(lucene-4.1.0-src.tgz / 21-Jan-2013) and it matches the online javadocs.
So I guess you're preparing for PyLucene
Hi Andi,
You're right - and API docs are wrong. Actually both must have change after 4.1
release: I checked the source of java-lucene v4.1 (lucene-4.1.0-src.tgz /
21-Jan-2013) and it matches the online javadocs. So I guess you're preparing
for PyLucene v4.2?
Note: I think that
LUCENE_SVN=htt
Hi Andi,
Thanks to your hints I was now able to build PyLucene4.1 and got further with
the FacetExample.py - The imports should be OK now and most of the required
changes are done I guess. However I now reached another problem: I need to
instantiate the class 'FacetsCollector' but get an error
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013, Andi Vajda wrote:
Indeed. I reproduced that error here.
A new method was added to the FieldCache.Parser interface.
I added it to the classes missing it (rev 1445048).
I then found that the test case from hell, TestSort.java, has majorly changed
again and test_Sort.py need
Hi Thomas,
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013, Thomas Koch wrote:
first please excuse I didn't get back to you regarding the tests - I did
start with it but then got stuck and distracted from other tasks popping
up. No excuse - I just failed to deliver what I promised.
Oh well. No worries.
Would you ple
Hi Andi,
first please excuse I didn't get back to you regarding the tests - I did start
with it but then got stuck and distracted from other tasks popping up. No
excuse - I just failed to deliver what I promised.
> ...
> Would you please port it to the new 4.x API so that it can be included wit
16 matches
Mail list logo
