Hi, Just a heads-up, I'm not a PyLucene user but a frequent user of JCC in another context wrapping scientific libraries in java. I would appreciate a Python 3 compatible JCC in the future, most libraries are now Python 3 compatible and I think in the future this will be the python standard for scientific computing. Of my stack that I use today I think JCC is the only library requiring python 2.
My programming skills are limited, but can provide debugging support :) Regards /Petrus On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Mon, 1 Jun 2015, Johan Jonkers wrote: > > Hello everyone, >> >> I was wondering if there are plans to support python 3 for PyLucene. I >> know there is an experimental Python 3 version of JCC but it is from 2010 I >> think, so a bit outdated. We would like to migrate from python 2.7 to 3.0 >> but we need PyLucene to work for that. Any information on this matter, like >> perhaps a roadmap?, would be appreciated. >> > > Two things need to happen: > - the python 3 port of JCC needs to be revived (patches are welcome) > - the Lucene team needs to vote on releases for another release of > PyLucene to actually happen. > > I prepared a PyLucene release candaidate for version 4.10.4 on March 10th > and called for a release vote then. > > Only one PyLucene user responded and _no_ Lucene PMC members (besides > myself) voted on it. Without votes, no PyLucene releases can happen. > > As it is, the project is dormant for lack of interest. > > Andi.. > > >> Regards, >> >> Johan >> >> >> -- _____________________________________________ Petrus Hyvönen, Uppsala, Sweden Mobile Phone/SMS:+46 73 803 19 00
