>
> So these were my personal thoughts and issues about.
>
> Have a nice weekend!
>
> Em sex, 9 de ago de 2019 12:41, Pedro Lacerda
> escreveu:
>
>> Question answered.
>>
>> Best regards!
>>
>> Em sex, 9 de ago de 2019 às 12:33, Christian &qu
Hi Pedro,
*count_states* is correct here; there's only 1 state, which is state 1. The
reason for the observed *count_atoms* behavior is that "polymer" and
"state" are different operators in the selection algebra, so putting them
together without a logical operator such as "and" or "or" between
; or "organic"?
>
> Em seg, 5 de ago de 2019 12:36, Christian "Cole" French <
> christian.fre...@schrodinger.com> escreveu:
>
>> I see now. I updated the code at the link in my previous email to provide
>> behavior which should
t; return compute_peplength(atom)
>
> I'm looking for the availability of user defined functions on selection
> expressions. How to?
>
> Em sex, 2 de ago de 2019 às 15:44, Christian "Cole" French <
> christian.fre...@schrodinger.com> escreveu:
>
>> Edit
Edit: remove the cmd. part when running select_with_filter. (Since it's a
custom command, it doesn't belong to the cmd module.)
On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 2:41 PM Christian "Cole" French <
christian.fre...@schrodinger.com> wrote:
> Hi Pedro Lacerda,
>
> Here is a link to a
Hi Pedro Lacerda,
Here is a link to a script I wrote which adds a command which does what you
ask: https://gist.github.com/ColeFrench/6f68fa5f04a67bb6234f10c25debb865.
To use it, download the file to the directory where you run PyMOL from,
then open PyMOL and run run select_with_filter.py.
For
