Re: [PyMOL] RE: povray image mapping and default pigments

2006-04-19 Thread Tsjerk Wassenaar
te lake lapping at the shores of a checkered > beach??? > > :) > > -Tom > > > -Original Message- > From: pymol-users-ad...@lists.sourceforge.net on behalf of Seth Harris > Sent: Tue 4/18/2006 2:45 PM > To: pymol-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [PyMOL] R

RE: [PyMOL] RE: povray image mapping and default pigments

2006-04-18 Thread Thomas Stout
kered beach??? :) -Tom -Original Message- From: pymol-users-ad...@lists.sourceforge.net on behalf of Seth Harris Sent: Tue 4/18/2006 2:45 PM To: pymol-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [PyMOL] RE: povray image mapping and default pigments To answer my own question...instead of ent

[PyMOL] RE: povray image mapping and default pigments

2006-04-18 Thread Seth Harris
To answer my own question...instead of entirely taking out the pigment{blah blah blah} statements from the texture_lists in the povray input as used to work, I found that in this case replacing them with "pigment {}" statements was still a permissible syntax and also allowed a #default pigment decl