[Fwd: [PyMOL] Apple new version X11]

2003-01-14 Thread Richard Gillilan
Richard Gillilan wrote:

Sorry, intended this to go out to the whole group.
Here goes again:

 
 Craig Smith wrote:
 
  I've installed X11 server through XDarwin.  Will the installation of
  PyMOL for OS X described on your web  page work with XDarwin's
  implementation of X11 or do I have to install Apple's version.  Is
  there any advantage in installing Apple's X11?  Will Apple X11
  installation overwrite XDarwin?
 
 
 They have encountered some problems over in OpenDx land
 with the new X11 from Apple. I have my code running mostly,
 but I think it's important to keep in mind that this is
 a beta version. Here is a quote one of the developers forwarded
 to me. It may or may not effect PyMol (uses GLUT?). Anyhow
 here it is:
 
 Just to let you know, Apple's X11 is beta and there are problems with
 it and X apps. For one thing the window manager does not honor any
 window placement and window size requests. This can really make apps
 like DX unusable. It also is missing some of the hardware rendering
 implementation XGL and thus DX's hardware rendering will not work.
 The developers are aware of the problems and will hopefully be
 addressing these before the final release is finished.
 
 Richard Gillilan
 MacCHESS, Cornell



[PyMOL] new user

2003-01-14 Thread Nukri Sanishvili
Hi all,



I just installed PyMol last week on my Linux and PC and laptop and I love
it! And v0.86 is of course better with its session-saving capability.



There is a new thing (I'm pretty sure it's a bug, not a feature) in 0.86:

When I Tab for command completion, the command ends with a comma when in
fact = is expected. For example, set cartoon_fl(Tab)at_sheets, not set
cartoon_fl(Tab)at_sheets=



Print quality doesn't seem to be as high as the image on the display. Do I
need to feed the PyMol output into something else first?



Can (how) I annotate the pictures in PyMol? If it's not there yet, I hope
it'll be soon as annotation is an indivisible right for any figure to have.



Cheers,

Nukri



Ruslan Sanishvili (Nukri) Ph.D.
GM/CA-CAT, ANL
9700 S. Cass Ave.
Argonne, IL 60439

Tel (630)252-0665
Fax (630)252-0667

rsanishv...@anl.gov




RE: [PyMOL] how to control the density coverage in pymol

2003-01-14 Thread Schubert, Carsten
Rongjin,

this works for me. You have to specify either buffer or carve with named
variables (hope that is the right term). inh1 is the selection I defined
the map to be centered on. 

# load maps
load 2fofc.ccp4, 2fofc_map
load fofc.ccp4, fofc_map

isomesh 2fofc, 2fofc_map, 1.4, inh1, carve=2
color marine, 2fofc 
isomesh fofc1, fofc_map, 3.0, inh1, buffer=2
color forest, fofc1
isomesh fofc2, fofc_map, -3.0, inh1, buffer=2
color firebrick, fofc2


Hope it helps

Carsten



-Original Message-
From: Rongjin Guan [mailto:gu...@umbi.umd.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 11:22
To: pymol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PyMOL] how to control the density coverage in pymol


Hi, all, 
I am new to this BB. 
In O we can use something like map_cover object radius to only 
display the density aroung the part model we are interested, and get 
rid of other densities neaby to make the figure clean. 
But in PyMOL, I tried insomesh den, map1, 1.0, (i;8,9), 3.0 to try 
to only display the density around residues 8 and 9, but there are 
still some additional densities neaby, which makes the figure a little 
dirty. Anybody has some ideas to deal with it? 
Thanks 
Rongjin Guan 
-- 
Rongjin Guan, Ph.D.
Center for Advanced Research in Biotechnology
9600 Gudelsky Drive
Rockville MD, 20850
Tel: 301-738-6210
Fax: 301-738-6255  


RE: [PyMOL] new user

2003-01-14 Thread DeLano, Warren
 From: Nukri Sanishvili [mailto:rsanishv...@anl.gov]

 There is a new thing (I'm pretty sure it's a bug, not a 
 feature) in 0.86:

 When I Tab for command completion, the command ends with a 
 comma when in
 fact = is expected. For example, set cartoon_fl(Tab)at_sheets, not set
 cartoon_fl(Tab)at_sheets=

Actually, that is a feature.  Slowly, the PyMOL command language is becoming 
more consistent (and more Python like).

set name,value

   is preferred over

set name=value

Since it follows the convention that arguments to PyMOL keywords are 
separated by commas.   Nevertheless, I am a strong proponent of backwards 
compatibility.  set parameter=value will continue to function for years to 
come so that old scripts will not break.  

 Print quality doesn't seem to be as high as the image on the 
 display. Do I
 need to feed the PyMol output into something else first?

Increase the resolution:

ray 2000,1500

etc.
 
 Can (how) I annotate the pictures in PyMol? If it's not there 
 yet, I hope
 it'll be soon as annotation is an indivisible right for any 
 figure to have.

Sorry, your figures will continue to be oppressed with versions 0.86.  
Liberation will come in due time.

Cheers,
Warren