Hi,
I have a question concerning the spheres representation. According to my
rough estimation the spheres drawn for individual atoms/ions don't seem not
match experimental atomic/ionic radii if I compare different elements. Is
that correct (I quickly checked for oxygen, phosphorus and
Hi Dong,
My guess is (but ofcourse Warren knows best) that pymol chokes in the
full pathname, including the spaces. Note that under windows the
actual pathname would be D:\DOCUME~1\1LTL.pdb The long pathname is an
alias.
Cheers,
Tsjerk
On 6/29/06, LIU Changdong cd...@ust.hk wrote:
Dear all:
Hi Michael,
The answer to the second question is: yes
alter selection,vdw=1.0
will change the radius of selected atoms to 1.0 angstrom.
Cheers,
Tsjerk
On 6/30/06, Michael Weber web...@staff.uni-marburg.de wrote:
Hi,
I have a question concerning the spheres representation. According to my
Hi Mark:
Most likely there is, but I don't know the answer to your question.
I'm posting this to the pymol users list (via cc) so hopefully
someone else will know the answer.
I trust all is going well for you.
Bill
On Jun 30, 2006, at 8:19 AM, Mark Collins wrote:
Hi Bill,
I've been
The easiest way I'm aware of to do this would be to use the ccp4 program
pdbset, but there are numerous other ways/programs that will do this (if
pymol has this capacity, I'm not aware of it; but someone else will
correct me).
Pete
snip
I've been looking through the PyMol reference and wiki
Hi,
This is really for Warren. A while ago there was
discussion of the ± of updates versus new
manuals. The current documentation is now several
years out of date. Are their plans to update this?
Thanks to all who have worked on Wiki and posted scripts on web sites.
Mark
--
