Re: [MMTK] Re: [PyMOL] improving interoperability between python moleculetoolkits (fwd)

2002-12-16 Thread Konrad Hinsen
Yes, CORBA is complex and has some overhead. I have also read that Microsoft's DCOM/OLE is very complex. I don't think either of these is a good way to go, though there are some very cool applications I have seen. A lab I know at LBL uses CORBA as a device interface. You can do nice things

Re: [MMTK] Re: [PyMOL] improving interoperability between python moleculetoolkits (fwd)

2002-12-16 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Richard Gillilan wrote: Even XML is very verbose for molecular data, but I haven't seen any better way to write general objects to disk. Apropos CML and verbose, I'd like to cite a recent post from Peter Murray-Rust from svg-developers: Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 09:07:44

Re: [MMTK] Re: [PyMOL] improving interoperability between python moleculetoolkits (fwd)

2002-12-13 Thread Richard Gillilan
Konrad Hinsen wrote: Indeed. But this illustrates nicely a frequent problem faced by software designers: Software like OpenDX is powerful and flexible, but also huge and difficult to learn. A small specialized tool is easier to use for the specialized user. Of course those users then find