At 10:41 13/12/2002 +0100, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
Gustavo Mercier gamerc...@yahoo.com writes:
As a suggestion, let's consider the chemistry implementation of XML --
CML. Whatever the details of the object molecule, it would be beneficial
to input and output to/from CML. A specification of
On Friday, December 13, 2002, at 01:41 AM, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
As a suggestion, let's consider the chemistry implementation of XML
-- CML. Whatever the details of the object molecule, it would be
beneficial to input and output to/from CML. A specification of
I don't agree. I looked at CML
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 10:33:47AM +, Jules Jacobsen wrote:
I completely agree here, an integrated total platform would be immensely
useful.
I think that the problem is not necessarily all that far from a solution-
currently there is a collaborative computing project for NMR (CCPN)
Hi again,
Ok, so the license is available at
http://www.bio.cam.ac.uk/nmr/ccp/project/about_ccpn/licensing/licensing.html
Unfortunately, this looks quite incompatible to the GPL:
(2) Conditions for DISTRIBUTION of SOFTWARE to MEMBERS
(2.1) An individual or ORGANISATION must be a MEMBER of
Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org writes:
It seems to be in everyone's interest to allow easy interoperation
between the toolkits. However, in my experience it is a frustrating and
difficult task, even for relatively simple tasks.
True.
I believe that a common set of core modules is required.
Hello all,
I share in Warren's vision of extending PyMol into a complete platform
for crystallography, computational chemistry, modeling, and
informatics. However, I believe this can only come about by cooperation
and integration with other python based molecule toolkits. MMTK has code
which may
