[PyMOL] INCENTIVIZE ?!

2002-09-02 Thread Luke Rice
Warren, You have clearly been working too hard - incentivize? And all CAPS, too. I hope I'm not alone in trying to _disincent_ you from using such a word, the horror of which was totally unanticipated by me. Happy Labor Day! Luke

[PyMOL] New Mac OSX Beta Release

2002-09-02 Thread Warren L. DeLano 1
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 nksau...@lbl.gov wrote: An appropriate U.S. Labor Day announcement as we remember the hard work Warren has put into PyMOL. Thanks! and there still quite a lot to do... ...such as pushing out a new native Mac OSX beta release: Version 0.84beta is a follow-on to the limited

[PyMOL] Re: PyMOL-users digest, Vol 1 #152 - 6 msgs

2002-09-02 Thread wgscott
Folks, I have made a tough decision. Like many of you, I believe that PyMOL has the potential to become an effective software tool for bioinformatics, structural biology, computational chemistry, cheminformatics, and Science education. However, by myself, working in my spare time, I can not

[PyMOL] OS X pymol version 0.84beta is excellent. Thank you!!!

2002-09-02 Thread wgscott
I just noticed the OS X pymol native update, downloaded and installed it and it is great. It also makes me think that one day I might even install OS 10.2(there was no reason to if pymol didn't work). Nice job Warren! Thanks. Bill Scott William G. Scott Associate Professor Department

Re: [PyMOL] OS X pymol version 0.84beta is excellent. Thank you!!!

2002-09-02 Thread Christopher Yip
At 7:49 PM -0700 9/2/02, wgsc...@chemistry.ucsc.edu wrote: I just noticed the OS X pymol native update, downloaded and installed it and it is great. It also makes me think that one day I might even install OS 10.2(there was no reason to if pymol didn't work). Nice job Warren! Thanks.

Re: [PyMOL] OS X pymol version 0.84beta is excellent. Thank you!!!

2002-09-02 Thread wgscott
I've put a screen-shot here if anyone wants to have a look. http://chemistry.ucsc.edu/~wgscott/xtal/page6.html Hopefully this will generate a little free publicity... On Monday, September 2, 2002, at 08:02 PM, Bronwyn Carlisle wrote: I second that motion. Very nice. Thank-you Bronwyn On