On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Bea During b...@openend.se wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Samuele Pedroni
samuele.pedr...@gmail.com mailto:samuele.pedr...@gmail.com wrote:
Samuele ctypes-stable Fri Apr 11
15:44:57 2008
Samuele run
Samuele ctypes-stable Fri Apr 11 15:44:57 2008
Samuele run-django Sat Jul 12 09:46:07 2008
these corresponded to results of the Google contracts, whether the svn
repo is staying around read-only or going away, they were referred
through urls to
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.com wrote:
===
PyPy 1.4: Ouroboros in practice
===
We're pleased to announce the 1.4 release of PyPy. This is a major
breakthrough
in our long journey, as PyPy 1.4 is
http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/3851
in case people missed it,
Samuele
___
pypy-dev@codespeak.net
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
Hello, I will send the following mail to pypy-dev later in the day,
please review
Hi, here is the tentative schedule for the upcoming 1.2 release:
- 19th of January: feature freeze (features under consideration are
listed in extradoc/planning/jit.txt with a reference to the release)
- 22th-29th
Samuele Pedroni wrote:
Hello, I will send the following mail to pypy-dev later in the day,
please review
of course ignore these lines, the reviewing I was seeking has happened
and the result sent
___
pypy-dev@codespeak.net
http://codespeak.net
FYI, I have unified the builders for lib-python and py.test -A tests for
compiled pypy-c.
These means that each night we compile less pypy-c and reuse them more.
Builders with app-level in their name usually imply now running the
lib-python tests too.
Stackless tests still run only the
holger krekel wrote:
maybe, anyone any other ideas?
with Carl we considered yesterday:
- vmribo from contracting ribosome
and
- vmdjinn
___
pypy-dev@codespeak.net
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
this broke the pickling of enumerate:
http://codespeak.net:8099/summary/longrepr?testname=AppTestInterpObjectPickling().test_pickle_enumbuilder=own-linux-x86-32build=541mod=pypy.interpreter.test.test_zzpickle_and_slow
I suppose reversed should to be pickable too.
benja...@codespeak.net wrote:
this is messy enough that it really need unit tests, we don't have
enough other tests to be sure they check what's going on here.
cfb...@codespeak.net wrote:
Author: cfbolz
Date: Wed Sep 2 17:53:35 2009
New Revision: 67433
Modified:
as discussed in the last sprint.
regards
___
pypy-dev@codespeak.net
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
Given that py.lib 1.0 final is out, I think it makes sense to switch
pypy active branches starting from trunk to use an external pointing to
that.
There are going to be some changes and possibly issues that will need
addressing, the work may need to happen on a branch at first.
I plan to work
Laura Creighton wrote:
Can people edit
http://wiki.europython.eu/Sprints
or make something on codespeak and then link to it there.
Not enough people are signed up for sprinting, and John wonders if
it is worth it to rent the rooms -- he is considering cancelling.
I wanted to put a link
Hi,
it would be nice if at least people with commit access and who plan to
be at the EP sprints this year would put in their dates in the usual
planning file by next week:
extradoc/sprintinfo/ep2009/people.txt
Also we should really think of finalizing the announcement next week
with some
Antonio Cuni wrote:
Hi all,
the early bid deadline for europython is on may 14th: together with the fee
you can also reserve the hotel room, but for doing that we need to know when
we plan to do the sprint.
IIRC, the idea was to do it before the conference, and maybe also after. Am I
Bolz, Christian Tismer, Holger Krekel,
Maciek Fijalkowski, Samuele Pedroni
and many others:
http://codespeak.net/pypy/dist/pypy/doc/contributor.html
___
pypy-dev@codespeak.net
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
to do it.
holger
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 16:43 +0200, Samuele Pedroni wrote:
==
PyPy 1.1: Compatibility Consolidation
==
Welcome to the PyPy 1.1 release - the first release after the end of EU
funding
Hi,
here at the sprint we have created a release branch for 1.1:
http://codespeak.net/svn/pypy/release/1.1.x/
we are working on producing a beta out of it today.
The final 1.1 release will also be produced from this branch.
If you fix relevant failures (buildbot current failures) please
Tismer, Holger Krekel,
Maciek Fijalkowski, Samuele Pedroni
and many others:
http://codespeak.net/pypy/dist/pypy/doc/contributor.html
___
pypy-dev@codespeak.net
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
I cleaned up the builds with lots of failures that happened on 3rd.
Btw build files are stored with names starting with build numbers in the
builder directories (named like the builders) under
/home/buildmaster/pypy on codespeak.
It seems that some our nightly translations by buildbot are
Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
I found out that I'm unable to force run by hand. It checks out the
revision from last build. Do you know how to bump it?
you need to use the rebuild from the builder page, the rebuild from the
build page will reuse the got_revision
Samuele Pedroni wrote:
Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
I found out that I'm unable to force run by hand. It checks out the
revision from last build. Do you know how to bump it?
you need to use the rebuild from the builder page, the rebuild from the
build page will reuse
Hi all,
since EuroPython there's been some thinking and planning about doing a
new release of PyPy 1.1 before the end of the year with a focus related
to the recent work on compatibility with applications and CPython and
stability.
We think that an important step in the process is to improve
I switched to only test these combinations:
1) hybrid gc thread old-style allworkingmodules
the result of a try run for this one can be seen at the usual place:
http://www2.openend.se/~pedronis/pypy-c-test/allworkingmodules/summary.html
Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote:
Jacob Hallén wrote:
onsdagen den 20 februari 2008 skrev Chris Lamb:
Laura Creighton wrote:
Interested Lurkers, as it were. Are there any of you out there? Does
this sound like something any of you are interested in?
It sounds very
Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote:
Hi Armin,
Armin Rigo wrote:
Around the Gothenburg sprint, we mentioned the idea to hold a sprint in
Leysin (Switzerland) again this winter. We don't have the EU any more
to pay us, but the Swiss Franc is now cheaper compared to the Euro :-)
I checked with
Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote:
Niko Matsakis wrote:
So, there are a few system calls that I don't think Java supports, but
Python does. So far I have found getpid() and setenv(), but probably
I will run into a few more. Rather than implement the native wrappers
required myself, I was
are you sure this tweak is still correct, I cannot remember the
intention of this code but I'm sure
it was not as it was for random reasons...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: fijal
Date: Sun Nov 4 15:16:32 2007
New Revision: 48286
Modified:
pypy/dist/pypy/rpython/rpbc.py
Log:
This
Maciek Fijalkowski wrote:
I've also checked in pypy parts (more or less) into
http://codespeak.net/svn/pypy/dist/pypy/doc/maintainers.txt
feel free to add yourself wherever you like and to modify this list as well
I looked at it, didn't really know how to fill it in without being
confused
Niko Matsakis wrote:
I guess the question is whether people consider the ability to throw
arbitrary objects (rather than only those whose type is a subtype of
Exception) a feature or a bug.
I'm on the fence myself: it makes translating to the jvm and clr
easier if we prohibit arbitrary
1.0 as an
interesting basis for greater things to come, as much as we do
ourselves!
have fun,
the PyPy release team,
Samuele Pedroni, Armin Rigo, Holger Krekel, Michael Hudson,
Carl Friedrich Bolz, Antonio Cuni, Anders Chrigstroem, Guido Wesdorp
Maciej Fijalkowski, Alexandre
If possible avoid code changes on dist to avoid confusion, unless they
are bug fixes
that need to be ported to the branch. We should release at some point
tomorrow.
Thanks, Samuele Pedroni
___
pypy-dev@codespeak.net
http://codespeak.net/mailman
below you'll find some notes about PyPy,
the 0.99.0 highlights and our aims for PyPy 1.0.
have fun,
the PyPy team,
Samuele Pedroni, Carl Friedrich Bolz, Armin Rigo, Michael Hudson,
Maciej Fijalkowski, Anders Chrigstroem, Holger Krekel,
Guido Wesdorp
and many others:
http
http://compilers.cs.ucla.edu/virgil/virgil-oopsla06.pdf
http://compilers.cs.ucla.edu/virgil/virgil-oopsla06.pdf
RPython for different reasons or by different means does similar things
already (devirtualisation,
separate flexible load time) and could be adapted to implement other
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: antocuni
Date: Fri Jun 30 16:08:16 2006
New Revision: 29534
Modified:
pypy/dist/pypy/rpython/ootypesystem/test/test_oorecord.py
Log:
Added a failing test.
Basically, if we modify the Record after its hash has already been
computed, we might obtain
holger krekel wrote:
Hi folks,
the DDorf sprint, EuroPython talk deadlines and
the 0.9 release are all jointly and quickly approaching.
Let's have a brief
#pypy-sync meeting Monday afternoon 5pm UTC+2, 29th May
with these topics and try to co-ordinate last preps
and
Armin Rigo wrote:
Hi Antonio,
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 04:53:28PM +0200, Antonio Cuni wrote:
# lltypesystem
def ll_listindex(lst, obj, eqfn):
items = lst.ll_items()
(...)
if items[j] == obj:
# ootypesystem
def ll_listindex(lst, obj, eqfn):
(...)
if
Antonio Cuni wrote:
Hi,
I have some problems for translating calls to unbound methods.
Let's show with an example:
class MyClass:
def __init__(self, x):
self.x = x
class MyDerivedClass(MyClass):
def __init__(self, x):
MyClass.__init__(self, x)
During rtyping the field
Antonio Cuni wrote:
Finally, the last question is ootypesystem-specific: I've noticed that
the rtyper sets the 'meta' field of every instance just after it has
been created: what does it contain? It seems to me that it contains the
class the object belongs to: am I correct? If so I could
Samuele Pedroni wrote:
Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote:
Will the .NET backend use the ootypesystem (which is what gensqueak uses)
it should use it but as it is, I think the ootypesystem is a bit too lax
type-wise, so the rtypeing of it can get away skipping casts (this is
mostly because so far
Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote:
Hi Antonio!
just a few things that were not mentioned yet.
First of all: would you like to have your code live in the official
pypy-dist directory (Holger proposed using your user directory)? If
yes that would mean that you had to agree to license your code under
Gerald Klix wrote:
Hi all,
I have a problem with GcStruct, Struct and Ptr I can not resolve with my
own devices.
After some trial with ctypes running on CPython I came up with the
following lowlevel representation for structures:
Ptr( GcStruct( CtypesGcStructure_ClassName
(
Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote:
Hi PyPy-dev!
I just checked in a new doc page containing short descriptions and links
of/to the preliminary EU reports. The page is at:
http://codespeak.net/pypy/dist/pypy/doc/index-report.html
These reports (for all the people that did not help prepare them :-) )
Drumheller, Michael wrote:
I am familiar with the GIL limitation on Python concurrency, e.g.,
http://codespeak.net/pypy/dist/pypy/doc/low-level-encapsulation.html#c
oncurrency
Does anyone know whether Java has a similar limitation? (Yes: I have no
experience with Java at all.)
notice that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mwh
Date: Mon Nov 28 18:27:39 2005
New Revision: 20364
Modified:
pypy/branch/somepbc-refactoring/pypy/translator/c/extfunc.py
pypy/branch/somepbc-refactoring/pypy/translator/c/genc.py
pypy/branch/somepbc-refactoring/pypy/translator/c/pyobj.py
feel free to give feedback and
raise questions.
contact points: http://codespeak.net/pypy/dist/pypy/doc/contact.html
have fun,
the pypy team, (Armin Rigo, Samuele Pedroni,
Holger Krekel, Christian Tismer,
Carl Friedrich Bolz, Michael Hudson,
and many others:
http
are mostly people that were at the Paris sprint
and contributed there.
If people don't want to be listed please tell us so, as people did
in the past.
regards, Samuele Pedroni.
___
pypy-dev@codespeak.net
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
holger krekel wrote:
Hi Carl Friedrich, hi all,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 22:40 +0200, Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote:
On todays pypy-sync meeting (minutes at
http://codespeak.net/pypy/extradoc/minute/pypy-sync-10-27-2005.txt) it
was decided that we would try to make a release on friday next week.
I'm about to make a release branch for 0.8
it will be at http://codespeak.net/svn/pypy/release/0.8.x
Samuele.
___
pypy-dev@codespeak.net
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
I'm about to remove the old translate_pypy
and make translate_pypy_new renamed to translate_pypy
the new default.
If you encounter problems make that known.
Here are the new options,
notice that to only annotate for example is enough to specify just
--annotate, it is not necessary to disable
Aurélien Campéas wrote:
Michael Hudson a écrit :
Aurélien Campéas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello, pypy people,
Armin Rigo a écrit :
Hi Boria,
We are indeed starting to think about more focused research areas in
PyPy. For example, along these lines, we will need more work on
compiler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: tismer
Date: Tue Sep 20 04:40:45 2005
New Revision: 17675
Modified:
pypy/dist/pypy/translator/goal/bench-windows.py
Log:
executable abs.richards abs.pystone rel.rich rel.pystone
pypy-c-17439 35165 ms 668.586
Christian Tismer wrote:
Hi Armin,
when I added a few tests for the new variable step variant,
I observed the following behavior of ranges:
When a variable is conditionally assigned two different ranges,
the ranges are kept, unless the steps are different.
Well, after all this is not too
Armin Rigo wrote:
Hi Ben,
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 10:03:28AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately thats exposes a new problem, as there is a function called
RaiseException included by windows.h! Maybe all your macros should be
prefixed by PyPy_
or something.
Argh. I see. Yes,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Chritian Tismer wrote:
If we teach the specializer to not crash if something
does not work out, but to add the problem blocks to a list,
then we could have one report with all pending problems
and work through this in a more general way.
We also would get an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I've been running translate_pypy -text targetpypy every couple of days
recently, to see how things are progressing, but I always get the same
error:
ImportError: No module named _formatting
Is this a known problem, or am I doing something wrong?
the
This mail is an attempt to summarize a bit our current thinking and
plans for starting implementing
os and math modules functionality.
The idea is to implement them as mixed modules (like sys and __builtin__
are now), so to have, for starting,
a module/posix and module/math packages in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Armin,
Not sure if it was this changelist, but you are new generating c with
nested comments, which doesn't seem to be allowed by all compilers.
e.g.
/* /* nothing */ = v106238-z_cls_my_method; */
this has just been fixed. Some tests failure were
holger krekel wrote:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 10:48 +0100, Armin Rigo wrote:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 03:56:34PM +0900, Sanghyeon Seo wrote:
File /home/tinuviel/pypy/dist/lib-python-2.3.4/sre_compile.py,
line 488 in compile
groupindex, indexgroup
OverflowError: long int too large to convert
holger krekel wrote:
Hi Samuele,
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 00:57 +0100, Samuele Pedroni wrote:
I have played a bit with generating static html pages summarizing where
we stand wrt the implementations of builtins.
A first cut can be seen starting here:
http://codespeak.net/~pedronis
Hi.
I have played a bit with generating static html pages summarizing where
we stand wrt the implementations of builtins.
A first cut can be seen starting here:
http://codespeak.net/~pedronis/deltareports/modules-index.html
the numbers refer to totals, numbers/percent of missing for
Michael Hudson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Author: pedronis
Date: Wed Mar 2 19:40:07 2005
New Revision: 9590
Modified:
pypy/dist/pypy/annotation/classdef.py
pypy/dist/pypy/annotation/model.py
pypy/dist/pypy/annotation/test/test_model.py
pypy/dist/pypy/annotation/unaryop.py
Hello,
This is a summary of what was accomplished and worked on during last sprint
in Leysin. Leysin is a village in the Swiss Alps, home to Armin Rigo. The
views of the surrounding mountains were spectacular. It seemed to
inspire us
to work harder. Thanks to Armin for organizing it:
* All
Armin Rigo wrote:
Hi Samuele,
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 03:51:50PM +0100, Samuele Pedroni wrote:
it depends on how you implement things, realloc needs to be expressed as
alloc and copy but I don't see what force you to incapsulate the array
in an extra layer object.
oops, sorry now I see, you want
Armin Rigo wrote:
On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 06:09:57PM +0100, Samuele Pedroni wrote:
(...) In Java, lisp etc is not that much a
relevant problem because for example Java arrays carry a length anyway
and are heap allocated.
Ops, by the way: we can't use a Java array to implement a RPython list
Samuele Pedroni wrote:
Armin Rigo wrote:
On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 06:09:57PM +0100, Samuele Pedroni wrote:
(...) In Java, lisp etc is not that much a relevant problem because
for example Java arrays carry a length anyway and are heap allocated.
Ops, by the way: we can't use a Java array
Armin Rigo wrote:
Hi Samuele,
So LLVM comes again under the focus; we should really give it a serious try at
some point.
There are clearly two point of views that we can take on RPython. The first
point of view is that RPython is a kind of nice syntax over a C- or Java-like
language (in this view
Samuele Pedroni wrote:
OTOH I'm sure whether trying to go with full force with 2 is the best
oops, I'm not sure
thing to get the first protototype interpreter running as an extension
in CPython, especially thinking about ref counting.
___
[EMAIL
Armin Rigo wrote:
Hi!
Sorry for focusing the next sprint so much on translation. This might have
put some people off. Well, lesson learned.
It doesn't mean we should stop talking about translation :-) Pushing the
previously dicussed ideas to their conclusion, we get an interesting point of
At 14:01 09.02.2004 +0900, Seo Sanghyeon wrote:
http://spyweb.hopto.org/
I think you will find this interesting, if you didn't know about it yet.
I didn't try it yet, but from what I read from their documentation,
it looks quite complete.
- No support for the Python standard library yet
see
70 matches
Mail list logo
