Re: [pypy-dev] Waf benchmark

2011-04-12 Thread David
On 04/12/2011 06:02 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote: Maciej Fijalkowski, 11.04.2011 11:53: I propose the waf benchmark removal. Originally, the idea was that we're slower than CPython for no good reason. Now that this benchmark measures some obscure piece of stdlib time (subprocesses) I don't think

[pypy-dev] Waf benchmark

2011-04-11 Thread Maciej Fijalkowski
Hello. I propose the waf benchmark removal. Originally, the idea was that we're slower than CPython for no good reason. Now that this benchmark measures some obscure piece of stdlib time (subprocesses) I don't think it's that necessary. Besides: * the variation between runs is too big, so we

Re: [pypy-dev] Waf benchmark

2011-04-11 Thread Armin Rigo
Hi Maciej, On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.com wrote: I propose the waf benchmark removal. Given that its speed is at 1 for CPython, 1 for PyPy without JIT, 1 for PyPy with JIT, it seems rather pointless indeed, at least for us. Armin

Re: [pypy-dev] Waf benchmark

2011-04-11 Thread Stefan Behnel
Maciej Fijalkowski, 11.04.2011 11:53: I propose the waf benchmark removal. Originally, the idea was that we're slower than CPython for no good reason. Now that this benchmark measures some obscure piece of stdlib time (subprocesses) I don't think it's that necessary. Besides: * the

Re: [pypy-dev] Waf benchmark

2011-04-11 Thread Alex Gaynor
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote: Maciej Fijalkowski, 11.04.2011 11:53: I propose the waf benchmark removal. Originally, the idea was that we're slower than CPython for no good reason. Now that this benchmark measures some obscure piece of stdlib