On 04/12/2011 06:02 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Maciej Fijalkowski, 11.04.2011 11:53:
I propose the waf benchmark removal.
Originally, the idea was that we're slower than CPython for no good
reason. Now that this benchmark measures some obscure piece of stdlib
time (subprocesses) I don't think
Hello.
I propose the waf benchmark removal.
Originally, the idea was that we're slower than CPython for no good
reason. Now that this benchmark measures some obscure piece of stdlib
time (subprocesses) I don't think it's that necessary.
Besides:
* the variation between runs is too big, so we
Hi Maciej,
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.com wrote:
I propose the waf benchmark removal.
Given that its speed is at 1 for CPython, 1 for PyPy without JIT, 1
for PyPy with JIT, it seems rather pointless indeed, at least for us.
Armin
Maciej Fijalkowski, 11.04.2011 11:53:
I propose the waf benchmark removal.
Originally, the idea was that we're slower than CPython for no good
reason. Now that this benchmark measures some obscure piece of stdlib
time (subprocesses) I don't think it's that necessary.
Besides:
* the
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
Maciej Fijalkowski, 11.04.2011 11:53:
I propose the waf benchmark removal.
Originally, the idea was that we're slower than CPython for no good
reason. Now that this benchmark measures some obscure piece of stdlib