holger krekel wrote:
Hi Antonio,
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 20:53 +0100, Antonio Cuni wrote:
as I said I've begun writing the .NET CLI backend; it is still very
experimental but it can already compile correctly some code snippets
such as the algorithm for computing fibonacci's numbers.
cool!
Hi Antonio,
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 10:52:42AM +0100, Antonio Cuni wrote:
The first decision I took is whether to generate IL code (to be
assembled with ilasm) or C# code: I choose the first mainly because C#
lacks the goto statement and it would be difficult to implement flow
control.
Hi Antonio!
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 10:52 +0100, Antonio Cuni wrote:
holger krekel wrote:
Hi Antonio,
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 20:53 +0100, Antonio Cuni wrote:
as I said I've begun writing the .NET CLI backend; it is still very
experimental but it can already compile correctly some code
Hi Armin, Antonio,
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 14:21 +0100, Armin Rigo wrote:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 10:52:42AM +0100, Antonio Cuni wrote:
I think it should be fairly simple to translate from the SSA form to a
more stack-friendly form useful for stack-based machines; the question
is: where
Am 20.03.2006 um 14:39 schrieb holger krekel:
Hi Armin, Antonio,
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 14:21 +0100, Armin Rigo wrote:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 10:52:42AM +0100, Antonio Cuni wrote:
I think it should be fairly simple to translate from the SSA form
to a
more stack-friendly form useful for
Hi Armin,
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 21:44 +0100, Armin Rigo wrote:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 02:39:48PM +0100, holger krekel wrote:
Also useful for other back-ends would be a way to reconstruct some kind
of expression tree. For example, in Squeak, it is more efficient to
generate a single
