On 11.06.2007, at 12:47, Armin Rigo wrote:
Hi Maciek,
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 08:44:50PM +0200, Maciek Fijalkowski wrote:
Ok, so what about usual Thursday 17:00?
Ok here, too.
___
pypy-dev@codespeak.net
Hi Christian,
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 03:26:39PM +0200, Christian Tismer wrote:
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 08:44:50PM +0200, Maciek Fijalkowski wrote:
Ok, so what about usual Thursday 17:00?
Ok here, too.
Just to make sure: that was about Thursday the 14th. Answering Ok on
Saturday the 16th
Hi Armin,
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 03:26:39PM +0200, Christian Tismer wrote:
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 08:44:50PM +0200, Maciek Fijalkowski wrote:
Ok, so what about usual Thursday 17:00?
Ok here, too.
Just to make sure: that was about Thursday the 14th. Answering
Ok on
Saturday the
Maciek Fijalkowski wrote:
Ok, so what about usual Thursday 17:00?
Fine for me.
ciao Anto
___
pypy-dev@codespeak.net
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
In a message of Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:18:58 +0200, Antonio Cuni writes:
Maciek Fijalkowski wrote:
Ok, so what about usual Thursday 17:00?
Fine for me.
ciao Anto
me too.
Laura
___
pypy-dev@codespeak.net
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
Maciek Fijalkowski wrote:
I know you're quite tired right now and all, but I think it would be
good to make some kind of pypy-sync next week or even the week after (we
need to decide on sprint topics anyway).
Particularly I would like to know people's opinion on pypy's scope. What
we
I know you're quite tired right now and all, but I think it would be
good to make some kind of pypy-sync next week or even the week after (we
need to decide on sprint topics anyway).
Particularly I would like to know people's opinion on pypy's scope. What
we would like to support, what we
On 6-Jun-07, at 9:58 AM, Maciek Fijalkowski wrote:
I know you're quite tired right now and all, but I think it would be
good to make some kind of pypy-sync next week or even the week
after (we
need to decide on sprint topics anyway).
I'm quite new to this list. Could you explain what a
