On Wednesday, September 7, 2011 at 10:38:10 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski
fij...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Antonio Cuni anto.c...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Jorge,
On 07/09/11 16:43, Jorge de Jesus wrote:
Hi to all
I've benchmark/profile some code (PyWPS API) and PyPy-c
On 03/09/11 08:51, Miquel Torres wrote:
Which revision is (or simulates) 1.6?
I don't think there is the exact revision on codespeed, because the release
was made on a branch (release-1.6.x, I think), not on trunk.
What about starting the benchmarks manually on the branch release-1.6.x?
On 08/09/11 12:15, Miquel Torres wrote:
which sadly doesn't have data on speed.pypy.org (not all data saved on
the removed environment was kept, sorry). The August 1st revision is
probably not acceptable to portrait as being 1.6 ...
looking at the graphs, I don't see any big difference between
Hi to all
Thank you for all the answers concerning the topic.
The deepcopy testing script in issue 767 [1], is working faster in PyPy
than in CPython, but deepcopy is run on a list of numbers.
BUT, PyWPS runs a lot of DOM functions and deepcopy calls that pass DOM
Elements as argument. Just
On Thursday, September 8, 2011 at 12:58:54 PM, Jorge de Jesus j...@pml.ac.uk
wrote:
Hi to all
Thank you for all the answers concerning the topic.
The deepcopy testing script in issue 767 [1], is working faster in PyPy
than in CPython, but deepcopy is run on a list of numbers.
BUT,
Hi to all
That was an interesting result, so (for what I understood) there is
nothing wrong with PyPy, it's just the code I'm trying to run doesn't
have sufficient loops for the JIT to kickstart and be useful ?
Any one has a copy of PyPy for dummies ^_^
All the best
Jorge
On 08/09/11 14:23,
Humm interesting, I wonder why it works in Cpython, when I get the
chance I will try making those changes and see if pypy works.
On 06/09/11 23:57, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc wrote:
2011/9/7 Greg Bowyer gbow...@fastmail.co.uk
mailto:gbow...@fastmail.co.uk
Hi all, I have a rather interesting in
Hi Laura,
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Laura Creighton l...@openend.se wrote:
John Pinner wants to know if any of us are coming and will there be a PyPy
sprint.
I am not --- England is no longer on my yearly road nowadays...
Also, maybe it's worth being recalled: the classical PyPy sprint
Done, I tagged revision 46161:eb30a0ef328e (1st of August) as PyPy
1.6. Can be seen now on the start page.
Cheers,
Miquel
2011/9/8 Antonio Cuni anto.c...@gmail.com:
On 08/09/11 12:15, Miquel Torres wrote:
which sadly doesn't have data on speed.pypy.org (not all data saved on
the removed
