On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> I'm mostly an observerer on the JVM + PyPy front, but my understanding is
> JPype or the like would be to solve the issue of "how do we test this
> without compiling all of PyPy".
Ah I see - a very different point of integration. Thanks for the
2012/1/12 [email protected]
> 2012/1/12 Michał Bendowski :
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > Back in the summer I asked on this mailing list if there's interest in
> moving the JVM backend forward. Back then there was some enthusiasm, so I
> got back to it when I had the chance, which unfortunately
2012/1/12 Michał Bendowski :
> Hello everyone,
>
> Back in the summer I asked on this mailing list if there's interest in moving
> the JVM backend forward. Back then there was some enthusiasm, so I got back
> to it when I had the chance, which unfortunately was a few months later. The
> suggesti
Hello everyone,
Back in the summer I asked on this mailing list if there's interest in moving
the JVM backend forward. Back then there was some enthusiasm, so I got back to
it when I had the chance, which unfortunately was a few months later. The
suggestion back then was to look into using JP
hi all,
I would like to make some propositions wrt NumPy port development:
1) It would be nice to have a build and/or install parameter to
available usage of numpypy as numpy, e.g. "setup.py build
--numpypy_as_numpy". I know it can be done via some tricks, but explicit
parameter would be bett
