Re: [pypy-dev] MinGW32 support PyPy with mscr90.dll

2012-09-19 Thread Armin Rigo
Hi Bookaa, On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 3:46 AM, bookaa wrote: > ... > I suggest this instruction should be add to PyPy doc: MinGW32 support Sorry for the delay. As you noticed, generally our interest in mingw32 is close to zero, with Visual Studio taking up all of our (already very tiny) interest ab

Re: [pypy-dev] Flow graphs, backends and JIT

2012-09-19 Thread Armin Rigo
Hi Fijal, On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > I guess this is what pypyjit.py does, more or less. You still need the > blackhole interpreter to run in something Right, indeed, pypyjit.py fulfills already the "debugging helper" role. That leaves only the "cool hack" rol

Re: [pypy-dev] Flow graphs, backends and JIT

2012-09-19 Thread Maciej Fijalkowski
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Armin Rigo wrote: > Hi Carl Friedrich, > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote: >> 2. More fundamentally (and this is where I think you have missed a detail >> about the JIT so far) the JIT ist trace-based. The JIT backends cannot deal >

Re: [pypy-dev] Flow graphs, backends and JIT

2012-09-19 Thread Armin Rigo
Hi Carl Friedrich, On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote: > 2. More fundamentally (and this is where I think you have missed a detail > about the JIT so far) the JIT ist trace-based. The JIT backends cannot deal > with arbitrary control flow, only with linear traces. You

[pypy-dev] PyPy at FOSDEM

2012-09-19 Thread Maciej Fijalkowski
Hi Just a quick question - is anyone from the team planning on attending FOSDEM in Brussels on 2-3rd of Feb 2013? Cheers, fijal ___ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev