On 03/30/2014 05:32 PM Leonardo Santagada wrote:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 9:36 AM, anatoly techtonikwrote:
On ABI level tools can be more useful, and there is where idea
intersects with CFFI. It doesn't cancel the fact that people need safe
feet injury prevention interfaces. Look for my previous
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 03:36:08PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Kenny Lasse Hoff Levinsen
> wrote:
> > Okay, just to get things right: What you want is an only-ABI solution,
> > which abstracts completely away from technical details, in a nice pythonic
> > w
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 9:36 AM, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> On ABI level tools can be more useful, and there is where idea
> intersects with CFFI. It doesn't cancel the fact that people need safe
> feet injury prevention interfaces. Look for my previous answer with
> the phrase "I mix C with binar
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Kenny Lasse Hoff Levinsen
wrote:
> Okay, just to get things right: What you want is an only-ABI solution, which
> abstracts completely away from technical details, in a nice pythonic wrapper?
Not really. I want a language independent ABI solution, yes. ABI-only
i
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Roberto De Ioris wrote:
>
> Hi, (disclaimer: i have worked a lot with cffi, and i basically love it
> because most of my projects are in C and i need to interface with them), i
> am not sure to follow you. You seem to mix C with binary/structures
> manipulation. C
Okay, just to get things right: What you want is an only-ABI solution, which
abstracts completely away from technical details, in a nice pythonic wrapper?
Having that idea suggestion is fine (although it is slightly off-topic on
pypy-dev), but it has nothing to do with the C Foreign Function Int
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Markus Unterwaditzer
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 02:49:00PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
>>> I know what C in CFFI stands for C way of doing things, so
>>> I hope people won't try to defend that position and instead
>>> try to think about what if we h
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 12:05:06PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Markus Unterwaditzer
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 02:49:00PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> >> I know what C in CFFI stands for C way of doing things, so
> >> I hope people won't try to
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Markus Unterwaditzer
wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 02:49:00PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
>> I know what C in CFFI stands for C way of doing things, so
>> I hope people won't try to defend that position and instead
>> try to think about what if we have to re
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 1:49 PM, anatoly techtonik
> wrote:
>> I know what C in CFFI stands for C way of doing things, so
>> I hope people won't try to defend that position and instead
>> try to think about what if we have to re-engine
10 matches
Mail list logo
