On 04:59 am, wlavrij...@lbl.gov wrote:
Jean-Paul,
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
And now for something completely different: ``Is it a cactus bug or
problem
with my war?''
import cppyy
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
Import
Hello,
I've been looking at cppyy a bit (with the goal of using an existing
project based on it). I haven't gotten far though.
When I try to use cppyy with the Ubuntu-packaged PyPy (on Ubuntu 14.04),
I get this:
Python 2.7.3 (2.2.1+dfsg-1, Nov 28 2013, 05:13:10)
[PyPy 2.2.1 with GCC 4.8.
On 05:39 pm, john.m.cam...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been noticing a pattern where many who are writing Python code
to
run on PyPy are relying more and more on using the jitviewer to help
them
write faster code. Unfortunately, many of them who do so don't look at
improving the design of their co
Hello all,
Looking at PyPy's buildbot, it appears that the current FreeBSD builder
is a FreeBSD 7 system. I'm curious who out there is interested in
FreeBSD 7 in particular, and whether anyone is interested in newer
versions (say, FreeBSD 9, recently released).
If there's interest, I think
On 03:11 pm, pypy-dev-requ...@python.org wrote:
Hi all,
Fijal and me would like to raise interest among various groups of
people about building a better ctypes replacement for Python.
The general background first, at least as far as we know it. People
generally agree that CPython extension mo
On 10:07 am, springri...@gmail.com wrote:
based on the irc chat here:
http://www.tismer.com/pypy/irc-logs/pypy/pypy.2011-11-02.log.html
PyByteArray_Type, PyMemoryView_Type and PyInterpreterState are missing
from the headers. http://codepad.org/FYkhcZKf
just wonder is there any schedule about
On 01:03 am, r...@rachum.com wrote:
I guess a script could be made that would go over *all* the classes in
CPython, see all their methods, compare to those of PyPy, and point out
which ones we forgot.
One could also examine a test coverage report from CPython and add unit
tests for all of th
On 09:06 pm, fij...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I would like to start thinking about PyPy 1.7 and I volunteer for
being a release manager. It seems modulo few failing tests we're
generally in a good shape. Things I would like to get into.
* my json improvements branch
* justin's memory pressure branch
On 07:09 am, ar...@tunes.org wrote:
Hi,
A follow-up to the blog post about Software Transactional Memory (STM)
at http://morepypy.blogspot.com/ .
[snio[
So, all this to say: 8 years later, I implemented that on CPython:
https://bitbucket.org/arigo/cpython-withatomic/overview (on the 2.7
branch
On 02:54 am, yselivanov...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, but that is kind of a weak argument, since the situation with
python 3 changes quickly. More and more libraries are being ported
each month. Supporting python 2 obviously just harms the python
ecosystem, as nobody interested in having two langu
On 12:32 am, tom_ro...@pobox.com wrote:
Tom Roche Sat, 30 Jul 2011 18:17:34 -0400
my current ubuntu
me@it:~$ lsb_release -ds
> Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS # yes, I am planning to upgrade Real Soon Now
me@it:~$ uname -rv
> 2.6.32-33-generic #70-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jul 7 21:13:52 UTC 2011
is too down-le
On 02:17 pm, fij...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
wrote:
2011/7/8 Cesare Di Mauro :
I fully agree. It's not an issue, but an implementation-specific
detail
which programmers don't have to assume always true.
CPython can be compiled without "smallints"
On 12:38 am, alex.gay...@gmail.com wrote:
repeat itself is not slow, it's just that when it's used it iterates
over
it, in RPython (meaning it's not jit'd) which results in a dictionary
lookup
for the next() method at every iteration, which is slowish, list hits a
special case so it doesn' thav
13 matches
Mail list logo
