PING: Did we make progress?
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Miquel Torres wrote:
> You can also do that in Github, which I prefer.
>
> However, since CPython and PyPy use mercurial, the general preference
> for Bitbucket is understandable.
>
>
> 2011/9/1 Brett Cannon :
>> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 0
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 01:10, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Antonio Cuni wrote:
>> On 31/08/11 22:11, Brett Cannon wrote:
>>>
>>> The PyPy folk could answer this as they have their repo on bitbucket
>>> already. Else I guess we can just create a standalone account that
>>>
You can also do that in Github, which I prefer.
However, since CPython and PyPy use mercurial, the general preference
for Bitbucket is understandable.
2011/9/1 Brett Cannon :
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 01:10, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Antonio Cuni wrote:
>>> On 31/08
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Antonio Cuni wrote:
> On 31/08/11 22:11, Brett Cannon wrote:
>>
>> The PyPy folk could answer this as they have their repo on bitbucket
>> already. Else I guess we can just create a standalone account that
>> represents the official speed.python.org account.
>
> for
On 31/08/11 22:11, Brett Cannon wrote:
The PyPy folk could answer this as they have their repo on bitbucket
already. Else I guess we can just create a standalone account that
represents the official speed.python.org account.
for pypy we do exactly that. There is a bitbucket user named "pypy" wh
Its all branches all the way down, so we can start work anywhere and push it to
an "official" PSF bin later I think. I'm sure we will want to host a mirror of
it on the python.org hg server too, just for discoverability.
--Noah
On Aug 31, 2011, at 1:12 PM, Miquel Torres wrote:
> Oh, cool, so t
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:34, Miquel Torres wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> though I took up on the task of installing a Codespeed instance
> myself, I didn't have time until now. This weekend I will definitely
> have a *lot* of time to work on this, so count on that task being
> done by then.
>
> The bitb
Opscode has already agreed to donate a Hosted account as long we keep it under
~20 clients :-) I can hand out the info for it to anyone that wants. As for
setting up the Chef repo, just remember we are trying to not manage this system
in isolation and that it will be part of a bigger PSF infrast
Oh, cool, so there will be an Opscode hosted account for the PSF,
right? Then the Chef repo should be for the PSF. Maybe in a current
account somewhere? What do you propose?
Miquel
2011/8/31 Noah Kantrowitz :
> Opscode has already agreed to donate a Hosted account as long we keep it
> under ~20
Noah is one person, yes you should help
On Aug 31, 2011, at 3:43 AM, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven
wrote:
> -On [20110831 02:57], Noah Kantrowitz (n...@coderanger.net) wrote:
>> Yahr, I be here. I would really like to see this done under a config
>> management system (I prefer Chef and thats b
-On [20110831 02:57], Noah Kantrowitz (n...@coderanger.net) wrote:
>Yahr, I be here. I would really like to see this done under a config
>management system (I prefer Chef and thats been the plan so far unless there
>are heavy objections). In general no one should ever be changing things on any
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
