Hi Tom,
On 30 April 2015 at 00:21, t...@twhanson.com wrote:
1) Am I correct in assuming that these are imports?
Yes.
2) Can these be eliminated? These opens are problematic in the absence of a
file system.
Try running pypy with the -s option. Likely, it doesn't remove them
all; you have
Hi Tom,
On 28 April 2015 at 19:56, t...@twhanson.com wrote:
Correction: non-functional without the *peer* class
VirtualizedSandboxedProc
Modern PyPy versions try to get some environ variables, at least as
documented in rpython/doc/logging.rst. It makes the
do_ll_os__ll_os_getenv() method
Correction: non-functional without the *peer* class
VirtualizedSandboxedProc
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 09:33:01 -0600, t...@twhanson.com wrote:
I'm confused about the relationship between
SimpleIOSandboxedProc and VirtualizedSandboxedProc.
Looking at pypy_interact.py I see that it is
I'm confused about the relationship between SimpleIOSandboxedProc and
VirtualizedSandboxedProc.
Looking at pypy_interact.py I see that it is multiply dependent from
SimpleIOSandboxedProc and VirtualizedSandboxedProc. I expected that
I'd be able to drop VirtualizedSandboxedProc and tweak the
Hi Tom,
On 27 April 2015 at 18:10, t...@twhanson.com wrote:
We can't hard-code the scripts into the binary becuase their purpose is to
adapt behavior to new configurations. Because of this the scripts will be
read from an external source and then executed. This is what makes the the
Maciej,
Thanks for the idea. I played with the sandboxed version and it looks
like it has potential.
I searched the web for a C/C++ version of the controller but with no
luck. I saw questions about it and interest expressed but couldn't
find anyone who had actually built one. Do you (or
Hi Tom,
On 25 April 2015 at 01:32, Maciej Fijalkowski fij...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 1:13 AM, t...@twhanson.com wrote:
Thanks for the idea. I played with the sandboxed version and it looks like
it has potential.
It's not necessarily the only option. A sandboxed process
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 1:13 AM, t...@twhanson.com wrote:
Maciej,
Thanks for the idea. I played with the sandboxed version and it looks like
it has potential.
I searched the web for a C/C++ version of the controller but with no luck.
I saw questions about it and interest expressed but
pypy generally needs to find a bunch of files for it's standard
library. I would suggest trying something a-la the sandboxed version
where all the external calls go via a special proxy that you can write
in C++. it's a bit of effort though. What are you trying to achieve if
you have no filesystem?
I'm evaluating PyPy for use in an application where it will be running in an
RTOS (Greenhills Integrity) which is congifured without a file system at
runtime. The rest of the application is C/C++.
Is there a way to build PyPy for this environment? The issue I see is that
10 matches
Mail list logo
