On 05/25/2012 11:03 AM, Armin Rigo wrote:
Hi Timothy,
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Timothy Baldridge wrote:
The only problem is that module and class only
accept strings as attribute keys.
Just a quick note: that's true for classes but not for modules.
Yes, but that doesn't help anyway
Hi Timothy,
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Timothy Baldridge wrote:
> The only problem is that module and class only
> accept strings as attribute keys.
Just a quick note: that's true for classes but not for modules.
Armin
___
pypy-dev mailing list
> Note that already nowadays you can hack (maybe we should just make
> such hacks more explicit): if you use not a general-purpose dictionary
> but instead a namespace like a module or a class, then reads are
> constant-folded with an out-of-line guard. This means you could
> rewrite your code for
Hi Timothy,
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Timothy Baldridge wrote:
> So my question is, how easy/hard would it be to somehow get a
> @purefunction decorator in Python instead of just RPython? For that
> matter, having __immutable_fields__ would also be nice, but that may
> be asking for too mu
While looking at ways to optimize the Clojure-Py code
(http://github.com/halgari/clojure-py) for pypy, I'm noticing that
much of Clojure-Py could benefit greatly from giving purefunction
hints to the JIT. For example, let's look at the polymorphic Clojure
functions known as "protocols":
def Proto
