As far as numpy, the last few blog status posts are probably give the best
idea:
http://morepypy.blogspot.com/2014/04/numpy-on-pypy-status-update.html
http://morepypy.blogspot.com/2014/03/numpy-status-update-february.html
Somewhere in there I mention count of tests passing out of tests total --
t
Hi Anto,
On 22.05.2014, at 09:49, Antonio Cuni wrote:
>
> thank you for the prompt answer. One more question, since I am sure that
> people will ask me :). Does PyPy work on android? I suppose the answer is
> "yes, but of course without integration with the UI", but better to check.
The answ
Hi David,
thank you for the prompt answer. One more question, since I am sure that
people will ask me :). Does PyPy work on android? I suppose the answer is
"yes, but of course without integration with the UI", but better to check.
I'll also point that the Rasperry-Pi foundation founded part of t
On May 20, 2014, at 4:56 PM, Antonio Cuni wrote:
> Hi all,
> Philip: same question for py3k. Is it still considered beta quality or we can
> say it's stable?
We’ll have a release out with 3.2 compatibility that we can consider ‘stable’
shortly. This will include one additional feature from
7? check out our blog post ;-)
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Antonio Cuni wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>
>> What do you exactly want to know about hippy performance?
>
>
> I simply want to put in a slide "hippy is N times faster than standard PHP",
> for some reasonable value of N. Nothing more :)
Hi,
> What do you exactly want to know about hippy performance?
>
I simply want to put in a slide "hippy is N times faster than standard
PHP", for some reasonable value of N. Nothing more :)
___
pypy-dev mailing list
pypy-dev@python.org
https://mail.
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 1:56 AM, Antonio Cuni wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am preparing the usual "PyPy status talk" which I'll give to the upcoming
> Pycon Italy, which is going to cover what happened in the last two years of
> PyPy.
>
> If you are interested, the draft slides are here:
> https://bitbu
I don't have any good numbers, sorry.
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 1:32 AM, Antonio Cuni wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 1:58 AM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
>
>> Oh, performance, the only Ruby implementation that's competitive with it
>> is the Oracle Ruby VM with Truffle, I think they've star
Hi all,
On 21.05.2014, at 01:56, Antonio Cuni wrote:
> David: what is the current status of PyPy on ARM? Should I say "it just
> works" or there is something more to add? What about performance?
>
Regarding ARM, the status is indeed "it just works" (although the JIT lacks a
few features comp
Hi Alex,
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 1:58 AM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> Oh, performance, the only Ruby implementation that's competitive with it
> is the Oracle Ruby VM with Truffle, I think they've started merging that
> into JRuby by now, so I'm not sure how that compares. Definitely faster
> than MRI
Oh, performance, the only Ruby implementation that's competitive with it is
the Oracle Ruby VM with Truffle, I think they've started merging that into
JRuby by now, so I'm not sure how that compares. Definitely faster than MRI
though :-)
Alex
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Antonio Cuni wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am preparing the usual "PyPy status talk" which I'll give to the
> upcoming Pycon Italy, which is going to cover what happened in the last two
> years of PyPy.
>
> If you are interested, the draft slides are here:
>
> https://bi
Hi all,
I am preparing the usual "PyPy status talk" which I'll give to the upcoming
Pycon Italy, which is going to cover what happened in the last two years of
PyPy.
If you are interested, the draft slides are here:
https://bitbucket.org/pypy/extradoc/src/tip/talk/pycon-italy-2014/talk.rst?at=ext
13 matches
Mail list logo
