On 01/18/2012 01:26 PM, Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote:
On 01/18/2012 11:27 AM, Dmitrey wrote:
> As for the table, if you think it's hard to create and maintain, I
could
> create it by myself, fill by currently done functions, share edit
> permission with you, and you will share it with other volunt
On 01/18/2012 11:27 AM, Dmitrey wrote:
> As for the table, if you think it's hard to create and maintain, I could
> create it by myself, fill by currently done functions, share edit
> permission with you, and you will share it with other volunteers, to
> keep them and other people of numpy funcs t
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Dmitrey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have compared contains of numpy and numpypy, numpy has 551 entries (and
> some of them are modules with lots of other funcs, like linalg or fft),
> while nympypy has only 121 entry - thus, I guess, numpypy still is too far
> from full nu
Hi,
On 01/17/2012 08:57 PM, Dmitrey wrote:
On 01/17/2012 08:35 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Dmitrey wrote:
Well, it doesn't matter essentially, from the code I just see it parses
dir(numpypy) and doesn't provide information on the funcs been
worked on,
thus
On 01/17/2012 08:35 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Dmitrey wrote:
Well, it doesn't matter essentially, from the code I just see it parses
dir(numpypy) and doesn't provide information on the funcs been worked on,
thus maybe my own efforts to port a func will be j
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Dmitrey wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I had proposed you to create an online table, where
> NumPy functions are split into the following categories:
> * already ported
> * under development (preferably with name of the person who works on it)
> * not started yet
> Is it pos
Hi,
I had proposed you to create an online table, where
NumPy functions are split into the following categories:
* already ported
* under development (preferably with name of the person who works on it)
* not started yet
Is it possible to get the data like this? This way other possible
contribu
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Dmitrey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 01/14/2012 08:22 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>>
>> Hi Dmitrey.
>>
>> Let me answer your questions one by one.
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Dmitrey wrote:
>>>
>>> hi all,
>>>
>>> I would like to make some propositions wrt N
Hi,
On 01/14/2012 08:22 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
Hi Dmitrey.
Let me answer your questions one by one.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Dmitrey wrote:
hi all,
I would like to make some propositions wrt NumPy port development:
1) It would be nice to have a build and/or install parameter
Hi Dmitrey.
Let me answer your questions one by one.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Dmitrey wrote:
> hi all,
>
> I would like to make some propositions wrt NumPy port development:
>
> 1) It would be nice to have a build and/or install parameter to available
> usage of numpypy as numpy, e.g. "
hi all,
I would like to make some propositions wrt NumPy port development:
1) It would be nice to have a build and/or install parameter to
available usage of numpypy as numpy, e.g. "setup.py build
--numpypy_as_numpy". I know it can be done via some tricks, but explicit
parameter would be bett
11 matches
Mail list logo
