On March 22, 2015 5:56:22 PM GMT+01:00, Robert Grosse
wrote:
>Since lists are specialized for storing primative ints, would it be
>possible to do something similar with user defined types? Assuming that
>most instances of the same type will either store or not store an int
>in
>the same attribu
Since lists are specialized for storing primative ints, would it be
possible to do something similar with user defined types? Assuming that
most instances of the same type will either store or not store an int in
the same attribute, you could optimistically specialize it initially and
fallback to t
Hey Timothy,
PyPy has no great solution for this yet. We have played with various
approaches, Armin has described some of them. The simplest one is one that I've
been trying recently on the typed-cells branch:
The basic idea is that for an attribute that stores an int, the attribute
stores a
Hi Timothy,
On 21 March 2015 at 01:43, Timothy Baldridge wrote:
> I'd like to add some optimization to app level types in Pixie. What I'm
> thinking of is something like this (in app level PyPy code):
There was some experiment in the PyPy branch
'type-specialized-instances' (in 2011-2013). The
I'd like to add some optimization to app level types in Pixie. What I'm
thinking of is something like this (in app level PyPy code):
class Foo(object):
def __init__(self, some_val):
self._some_val = some_val
def set_value(self, val):
self._some_val = val
In a perfect world the JI
