On 11/27/20 7:03 PM, Ronan Lamy wrote:
On 26/11/2020 18:16, Matti Picus wrote:
Now that the re fixes are in for py3.7, I think our primary branch
for development should be py3.7, with backports to py3.6 if needed.
PEP 494 for python 3.6 has that version in a security-fixes-only
stage, so we s
On 26/11/2020 18:16, Matti Picus wrote:
Now that the re fixes are in for py3.7, I think our primary branch for
development should be py3.7, with backports to py3.6 if needed. PEP 494
for python 3.6 has that version in a security-fixes-only stage, so we
should adopt a similar strategy (although
Now that the re fixes are in for py3.7, I think our primary branch for
development should be py3.7, with backports to py3.6 if needed. PEP 494
for python 3.6 has that version in a security-fixes-only stage, so we
should adopt a similar strategy (although some bug-fixes may be needed,
especially
