Re: [pypy-dev] culling non-functional build slaves

2015-03-14 Thread Armin Rigo
Hi Yuriy, Looking at the situation Matti describes where some buildslaves have not been running for months, it seems that nobody was really interested in looking at the results enough to care about sending a mail to their owners... So while we do appreciate some buildslaves, and they are not a

Re: [pypy-dev] culling non-functional build slaves

2015-03-13 Thread Yuriy Taraday
Hello, Matti. On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 5:40 PM Matti Picus matti.pi...@gmail.com wrote: I propose we remove the non-functioning build slaves. I have been trying to contact the owners, here is what I have so far: http://buildbot.pypy.org/builders/pypy-c-jit-freebsd-8-x86-64 ananke: offline

[pypy-dev] culling non-functional build slaves

2015-03-13 Thread Matti Picus
I propose we remove the non-functioning build slaves. I have been trying to contact the owners, here is what I have so far: http://buildbot.pypy.org/builders/jit-benchmark-linux-x86-64-single-run speed-python-64: offline since June http://buildbot.pypy.org/builders/own-indiana-x86-32

Re: [pypy-dev] culling non-functional build slaves

2015-03-13 Thread Maciej Fijalkowski
+1 on all you propose On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Matti Picus matti.pi...@gmail.com wrote: I propose we remove the non-functioning build slaves. I have been trying to contact the owners, here is what I have so far: http://buildbot.pypy.org/builders/jit-benchmark-linux-x86-64-single-run