Re: [pypy-dev] curses_cffi and others

2013-03-08 Thread Samuele Pedroni
hi, think so, here is what I get if I try to install the versions already there with their egg-info files: $ pip install argparse==1.2.1 Requirement already satisfied (use --upgrade to upgrade): argparse==1.2.1 in /usr/lib/python2.7 Cleaning up... $ pip install wsgiref==0.1.2 Requirement already s

Re: [pypy-dev] curses_cffi and others

2013-03-08 Thread Samuele Pedroni
and also: $ pip install wsgiref Requirement already satisfied (use --upgrade to upgrade): wsgiref in /usr/lib/python2.7 Cleaning up... On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Samuele Pedroni wrote: > hi, think so, here is what I get if I try to install the versions already > there with their egg-info

Re: [pypy-dev] curses_cffi and others

2013-03-08 Thread Armin Rigo
Hi Samuele, On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Samuele Pedroni wrote: > part of what cpython does (did?) in this sort of cases is to ship a > *.egg-info for the package that has an external existence as well, like in > CPython2.7 you can see there are .egg-info files for wsgiref and argparse in > th

Re: [pypy-dev] curses_cffi and others

2013-03-05 Thread Samuele Pedroni
part of what cpython does (did?) in this sort of cases is to ship a *.egg-info for the package that has an external existence as well, like in CPython2.7 you can see there are .egg-info files for wsgiref and argparse in the stdlib dir. On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Armin Rigo wrote: > Hi all

Re: [pypy-dev] curses_cffi and others

2013-03-02 Thread Gabriel de Perthuis
On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 17:44:27 +0100, Armin Rigo wrote: Le 01 Mar 2013 17:44:27 +0100, Armin Rigo a écrit: > Hi Gabriel, > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Gabriel de Perthuis > wrote: >> Packages using CFFI should be able to install-require CFFI whatever the >> interpreter is, including requirin

Re: [pypy-dev] curses_cffi and others

2013-03-01 Thread Armin Rigo
Hi Gabriel, On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Gabriel de Perthuis wrote: > Packages using CFFI should be able to install-require CFFI whatever the > interpreter is, including requiring newer versions than the one the > interpreter > ships. The problem is that the pure Python CFFI is rather tied t

Re: [pypy-dev] curses_cffi and others

2013-03-01 Thread Gabriel de Perthuis
> Hi all, hi Jeremy, > > I'm thinking about merging the curses_cffi branch, and I see efforts > going on in sqlite-cffi. Great :-) > > We need to think about how we want to support cffi-based modules in > PyPy. So far the idea is to include the official release of CFFI > together with regular P

Re: [pypy-dev] curses_cffi and others

2013-03-01 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Armin (2013.03.01_12:54:09_+0200) > We need to think about how we want to support cffi-based modules in > PyPy. So far the idea is to include the official release of CFFI > together with regular PyPy installations. The related question is: How do we ship CFFI modules in PyPy? Import all the cf

Re: [pypy-dev] curses_cffi and others

2013-03-01 Thread Костя Лопухин
Hi! Maybe a possible way is that you have "major" releases of cffi without backward incompatible changes that correspond to PyPy releases - so that any cffi 1.x works on PyPy 2.0, and any cffi 2.x works on PyPy 2.1, etc. And than you can complain if there is major version mismatch of cffi. So there

[pypy-dev] curses_cffi and others

2013-03-01 Thread Armin Rigo
Hi all, hi Jeremy, I'm thinking about merging the curses_cffi branch, and I see efforts going on in sqlite-cffi. Great :-) We need to think about how we want to support cffi-based modules in PyPy. So far the idea is to include the official release of CFFI together with regular PyPy installation