Hi Matti,
On 1 August 2014 07:01, Matti Picus wrote:
> Did Travis seem to indicate they would accept contributions from outside
> toward making a new ndarray implementation a reality?
I didn't ask (and am not sure why you mean by) a new ndarray
implementation. I did ask him about making a cffi
Did Travis seem to indicate they would accept contributions from outside
toward making a new ndarray implementation a reality? Until we can find
a wagon to hitch our minimal efforts to, I will keep working slowly on
micronumpy. It seems useful for some tasks, and will be even more so
once linal
Hi,
On 26 July 2014 11:19, Antonio Cuni wrote:
> this looks interesting, but from a quick look it seems they are only
> offering a C++ API?
> In that case, it might be better/easier to wrap it through cppyy than cffi.
One or the other, yes.
> Also, did Travis told you what are the plans for sci
Hi,
this looks interesting, but from a quick look it seems they are only
offering a C++ API?
In that case, it might be better/easier to wrap it through cppyy than cffi.
Also, did Travis told you what are the plans for scipy?
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Armin Rigo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Feedbac
Hi,
Feedback, from Travis Oliphant at EuroPython: libdynd
(https://github.com/ContinuumIO/libdynd) might be the longer-term
future of NumPy, and it looks like it would be much more natural to
bind to it from PyPy (via cffi). Worth a look I believe. It
certainly looks to me like such a cffi bindi
