On 22 July 2013 16:18, Nathan Hurst wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 08:25:46PM -0700, Alex Gaynor wrote:
>> No, there currently isn't a way to parallelize building.
>
> Ok. Is it hard or just low priority?
It's mostly pretty hard, although it's not the same reason through
each of the stages inv
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Nathan Hurst wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 08:25:46PM -0700, Alex Gaynor wrote:
>> No, there currently isn't a way to parallelize building.
>
> Ok. Is it hard or just low priority?
hard. there is some work ongoing, but we need a working STM first ;-)
>
>> Ale
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 08:25:46PM -0700, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> No, there currently isn't a way to parallelize building.
Ok. Is it hard or just low priority?
> Alex
>
> PS: Attentive readers will note that technically the very last phase of
> compilation is parallelized.
Yes, and I guess if it
No, there currently isn't a way to parallelize building.
Alex
PS: Attentive readers will note that technically the very last phase of
compilation is parallelized.
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Nathan Hurst wrote:
> Dear mailing list,
> I have looked around the web and through the various m
Dear mailing list,
I have looked around the web and through the various makefiles and
pypy/goal/targetpypystandalone.py and I can't work out how to make
pypy build using more cores. I have plenty of RAM (64GB) but the
build is only using a single core. Is it possible?
njh
___
