Hi,
> On 24 July 2015 at 00:40, Antonio Cuni wrote:
>> hi Armin,
>> following the discussion we had today, that TransactionQueue could be easier
>> to understand for people if you explain it as "a for loop in which you don't
>> know the order of the iteration"
On 24 July 2015 at 09:26, Dima Tisn
Supplying argument list at decoration time is hardly ideal.
Typical call site would pass argument sequence at invocation time.
Thus you probably want to rewrite this decorator and allow application
without argument list:
@parallel
def foo(item)
return item ** 123
results = foo(range(9))
Per
hi Armin,
following the discussion we had today, that TransactionQueue could be
easier to understand for people if you explain it as "a for loop in which
you don't know the order of the iteration", I figured out that we might
even introduce some syntactic sugar for it; not sure if it makes things
s
