I took a stab at it and it turns out the implementation is pretty complex.
If anyone wants to give it a shot, I'd love to get some help.
בתאריך יום ו׳, 6 במאי 2016 ב-19:36 מאת Armin Rigo <ar...@tunes.org>:
> Hi Omer,
>
> On 6 May 2016 at 11:04, Omer Katz wrote:
> > I agree that we can c
Hi Omer,
On 6 May 2016 at 11:04, Omer Katz wrote:
> I agree that we can certainly benefit from using blists in large enough
> lists. How much is large enough? We'll probably need to benchmark right?
>
> Are there any JIT paths for blist operations?
Do you mean "would we need to add specific JIT
I agree that we can certainly benefit from using blists in large enough
lists. How much is large enough? We'll probably need to benchmark right?
Are there any JIT paths for blist operations?
Will blists run faster because of the JIT or just because the rest of the
runtime is more efficient?
On Fr
Hi Omer,
On 6 May 2016 at 09:02, Omer Katz wrote:
> I'm wondering if PyPy could by a chance benefit from implementing the blist
> algorithm as a strategy. Possibly even switching it to be the default.
>
> What do you guys think?
It would certainly be interesting to try.
The problem with using *
