On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Ilya Osadchiy wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
> wrote:
>> I don't think there are tests for an "installed" interpreter at the moment.
>
> Perhaps some [separate] tests on "installed" pypy should be added.
> `easy_install` and friends
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc wrote:
> I don't think there are tests for an "installed" interpreter at the moment.
Perhaps some [separate] tests on "installed" pypy should be added.
`easy_install` and friends are rather critical for usability.
__
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc wrote:
2011/10/6 Ram Rachum :
> > I remember that I had trouble using `easy_install` when I was just
> setting
> > up PyPy 1.6 on my XP box.
>
> > I had no time to document it at that time, but I believe my workflow was
> to
> > download and run
2011/10/6 Ram Rachum :
> I remember that I had trouble using `easy_install` when I was just setting
> up PyPy 1.6 on my XP box.
> I had no time to document it at that time, but I believe my workflow was to
> download and run distribute_setup.py, then do `easy_install pip`, and then
> `pip install
