On Wed, 2020-09-16 at 16:56 +0300, Matti Picus wrote:
> I have uploaded rc2 of pypy v7.3.2 to https://buildbot.pypy.org/pypy/
> (note the trailing slash)
>
>
> The hashes are here
> https://foss.heptapod.net/pypy/pypy.org/-/blob/branch/default/pages/download_advanced.rst#L465
>
>
> The releas
On 9/10/20 2:08 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
I wholeheartedly support that. Gentoo has switched to Python 3.7 by
default already, and it sucks that the only version of PyPy3 is behind
that. That said, have you considered going straight to 3.8? In my
experience, the switch from 3.7 to 3.8 was far l
On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 14:00 +0300, Matti Picus wrote:
> On 9/10/20 1:45 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > So far I and the Fedora maintainer were able to independently backport
> > one vulnerability that clearly applied (the tarfile one) but we weren't
> > able to get a clear match of any other Python 3.
On 9/10/20 1:45 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
So far I and the Fedora maintainer were able to independently backport
one vulnerability that clearly applied (the tarfile one) but we weren't
able to get a clear match of any other Python 3.x fixes to 2.7 codebase.
Well, until today when thanks to you I
On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 13:37 +0300, Matti Picus wrote:
> On 9/10/20 12:40 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > I've filed two MRs for a start:
> > https://foss.heptapod.net/pypy/pypy/-/merge_requests/752
> > https://foss.heptapod.net/pypy/pypy/-/merge_requests/753
> >
> > Could you please let me know if tha
On 9/10/20 12:40 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
I've filed two MRs for a start:
https://foss.heptapod.net/pypy/pypy/-/merge_requests/752
https://foss.heptapod.net/pypy/pypy/-/merge_requests/753
Could you please let me know if that approach is ok? If so, I'll tackle
the remaining vulnerabilities (arou
On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 00:41 +0300, Matti Picus wrote:
> On 9/10/20 12:04 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > Is this something to be done just before the release? Would you accept
> > fixes rebased specifically on top of current pypy code?
> >
> > Unless I'm mistaken, bpo-39603 should be trivial to fi
On 9/10/20 12:04 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
Is this something to be done just before the release? Would you accept
fixes rebased specifically on top of current pypy code?
Unless I'm mistaken, bpo-39603 should be trivial to fix. I can submit
a merge request if you want.
I am willing to accept
On Wed, 2020-09-09 at 12:41 +0300, Matti Picus wrote:
> On 9/9/20 9:55 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Tue, 2020-09-08 at 23:15 +0300, Matti Picus wrote:
> > > I have uploaded rc1 of pypy v7.3.2 to https://buildbot.pypy.org/pypy/
> > > (note the trailing slash) which should be mirrored soon to
> >
On 9/9/20 9:55 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Tue, 2020-09-08 at 23:15 +0300, Matti Picus wrote:
I have uploaded rc1 of pypy v7.3.2 to https://buildbot.pypy.org/pypy/ (note the
trailing slash) which should be mirrored soon to
https://downloads.python.org/pypy/
The hashes are here
https://foss.h
On Tue, 2020-09-08 at 23:15 +0300, Matti Picus wrote:
> I have uploaded rc1 of pypy v7.3.2 to https://buildbot.pypy.org/pypy/ (note
> the trailing slash) which should be mirrored soon to
> https://downloads.python.org/pypy/
>
> The hashes are here
> https://foss.heptapod.net/pypy/pypy.org/-/blo
11 matches
Mail list logo
