On 07/09/2011 10:17 AM Armin Rigo wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 5:20 AM, William ML Leslie
wrote:
My point about small integers (...)
I think that your point about small integers is broken (even assuming
that smallints are enabled by default, which is not the case). It
means that we'd
Hi Bengt,
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Bengt Richter wrote:
> >>> id([1]) == id([2])
> True
As pointed out by Carl Friedrich, the real definition of "id" is:
* if x and y are two variables, then "x is y" <=> "id(x) == id(y)".
That's why in any Python implementation,
>>> x=[1]; y=[2]; id(
On 07/10/2011 04:09 PM Armin Rigo wrote:
Hi Bengt,
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Bengt Richter wrote:
>>> id([1]) == id([2])
True
True, I did write that. The key word in my line
before that was `superficially' ;-)
As pointed out by Carl Friedrich, the real definition of "id" is:
*
What do we want to happen when somebody -- say in a C extension -- takes the id
of an object
that is scheduled to be removed when the gc next runs?
Laura
___
pypy-dev mailing list
pypy-dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
